【作者】 许超仪；

【导师】 胡亚球；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 在“公正与效率”两大主题的要求下,各个国家在追求发现实体真实、保护公民实体权利的基础上,对其程序权利也应给予足够的重视。在诉讼日益爆炸的今天,各国面临的问题就是诉讼拖延,因此很多国家把“促进诉讼”作为民事司法改革的一项基本目标和要求,其中最具代表性的就是规定了“当事人诉讼促进义务”。其在防止诉讼拖延上起到了积极的作用,它作为对诉讼主体的程序调控机制,通过“失权”机能的释放,提高诉讼效率,从而保障实体公正的实现。同时,在辩论主义向协同主义演变的思潮中,要求充分发挥当事人与法官的积极作用,使法官与当事人之间、当事人相互之间协同合作推进诉讼。因此当事人诉讼促进义务被赋予了新的内容,包括一般的诉讼促进义务和协力解明事实关系的义务,前者是在程序上当事人有不故意迟延诉讼的义务;后者是在实体的事实说明上当事人有积极阐明事实的义务。我国为防止从超职权、高效率但有损公正的职权主义走向法官过于消极、当事人滥用诉讼权利而导致过分迟延的当事人主义,有必要加强当事人诉讼促进义务的构建。因此本文借助对德国制度的探悉,试图为我国构建当事人诉讼促进义务给予启发。更多还原

【Abstract】 Under the two major requirements of justice and efficiency, each nation should attach great importance to the rights of procedure when it endeavors to discover the entity truthfulness and to protect the droits of citizens. Today, the number of litigations is soaring. Due to the problem of litigation delay, many countries make Litigation Facilitation a basic target and demand in the reform of civil judicatories reform. Among which, the most representative one is the Rule of Litigation Facilitation Obligation. The rule plays a positive role in circumventing litigation delay, improves the litigation efficiency and ensures the entity justice.Since the principle of debate evolved to the principle of cooperation, active cooperative roles played by judges and parties will facilitate litigation. New contents have been added to the Rule of Litigation Facilitation Obligation which includes general litigation facilitation obligation and cooperatively interpreting factual relations obligation.The former one means that all parties have the duty of not deliberately delaying the litigation, the latter one means that all parities have the duty to actively clarify the reality. China is undergoing from the authority system to litigantarian system. The authority system is highly efficient but impairs the justice. The passiveness of judges and abuses of litigation rights by parties involved lead to over-delay. Through elaborately analyzing the German model, this dissertation tries to preliminarily probe into the formation of Rule of Litigation Facilitation Obligation in China.更多还原