【作者】 靳小炎；

【导师】 黄学贤；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 行政判决方式是对行政诉讼法立法目的的最终体现,判决方式能否有效地保护提起诉讼的相对人的合法权益,是对其设立是否合理以及是否仍存在缺陷的唯一评判标准。我国现行行政诉讼判决方式有:维持判决、撤销判决、撤销并重作判决、变更判决、履行判决、赔偿判决、确认判决和驳回诉讼请求判决。判决方式仍然存在着明显的缺陷,存在着“官了民不了”的窘境。本文针对存在缺陷,以解决行政诉讼在保护相对人合法权益上的不足的实际需要为目的,以实证方法和比较法学的方法,根据行政诉讼法理,借鉴各国和地区有关成熟的行政诉讼立法制度中关于判决方式的设立,从一般完善和立法完善两个层次出发,对现行判决方式适用的完善作了分析并提出了相关的建议,并提出了新的判决方式的设立:取消维持判决和确认合法有效判决,扩大变更判决和驳回判决适用范围,明确完善撤销判决、重作判决的适用条件,履行判决内容的有条件明确化,情况判决中公共利益的界定、利益衡量的运用原则、补救措施的范围和可行性条件、当事人不提出赔偿请求的告知救济途径、情况判决应以驳回请求判决方式而不宜适用确认违法判决,增加设立禁令判决、中间判决、自为判决、舍弃、认诺判决、禁止重作判决。更多还原

【Abstract】 The administration verdict method is the fundamental purpose of the administrative litigation legislation . whether it can protect the legal rights of the parties to the suit ,is the unique standard to judge its rationality .The current verdict methods of the administration litigation in our country includes: maintenance verdict, rescindable verdict, modifiable verdict, implemental verdict, etc. However, it still has obvious defects. Aiming at solving this problem and protecting the legal interest of the litigant to the administrative litigation. The author, by exercising substantial and comparative method , analyses status quo in our country ,draws lessons from other countries, proposes feasible suggestions, with the purpose to polish and improve the current way of verdict in administration litigation .What is worthy of mention is that the author puts forward new verdict methods and feasible suggestions to this aspect: cancelling the maintenance verdict and confirming the legal and effective sentence; extending the scope of modifiable and rebuttable sentence; making the condition to perfect the modifiable and re-act verdict definitely ;making sure the implement of a verdict .And in terms of circumstance verdict ,the principle and keys we should have in mind is that how to judge the public interests and measure the interests of the two parties , how to definite the scope of remedial measures and the condition of feasibility , how to find remediable ways if one party concerned doesn’t put forward indemnification request before the court. .The circumstance verdict should use verdict method by pronouncing against the appeal rather than confirming it illegal. In the last ,the author also suggests to establish restriction verdict, in-the-middle verdict, from for sentence, promise verdict and non re-act verdict in administrative litigation..更多还原