【作者】 吴海南；

【导师】 赵康；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 行政管理， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 MED(管理教育与发展)在美国已经成为管理学的一个重要分支研究领域,在中国还很少有人涉足。本文通过界定MED的含义和活动范围,率先在中国介绍了这个研究领域。MED的研究对象涵盖了管理专业教育的所有活动,笔者主要聚焦在课程设置活动上。在发展专业课程设置的一般理论工具时,笔者采用了一个多视角探索的研究方法,分别从教育学、专业社会学、公共管理学以及教育经济学等视角透视了专业课程设置所涉及到的各个实体要素的作为。笔者还介绍了美国四次MED大调查在管理专业课程设置上的发现以及这些发现所导致的管理专业教育改革,并解读了在这几次MED调查结果的基础上形成的AACSB的评估模式,随后对这个评估模式进行理论分析。在个案研究上,笔者主要通过了访谈法对苏州大学商学院的课程设置情况进行调查,从而对中国大学的专业课程设置流程有一定的了解。然后笔者将调查结果和此前发展出的专业课程设置理论工具以及美国的评估模式进行对照,发现了中国专业课程设置的一些问题,比如过度的行政集权、学生因素的缺失以及教学方式太过单一等等,针对这些问题,文章提出了一些对策。更多还原

【Abstract】 MED (Management Education and Development) has become one of most important research areas of management in the United States, while in China, there is still very few people involves in it. Therefore this article takes the lead in introducing MED, through bounding its signification and territory. Since the research objects of MED contain all the activities in management education, the author mostly focuses on its curriculum design. For developing a common theoretical tool on designing specified curriculum, the author utilizes a research method of triangulation, to observe the functions of all the related entities.Meanwhile, the author introduces four MED investigation activities in USA, especially the findings and reforms on management curriculum designing, and analyzes an evaluation system of AACSB, which was developed based on these four investigations. The author also discusses the applicability of this system in China.As taking Soochow University for a case study, the author expects to acknowledge the process in designing specified curriculum in a Chinese University. Then he compares the result of this survey with the specified curriculum designing theoretical tool and the experiences from America. After this comparison, the author concludes and develops some measures, to solve the problems he finds, such as the over-centralized governmental power in Chinese Universities, the lack of student factors in MED curriculum designing and the singleness in teaching methods.更多还原