【作者】 王海兰；

【导师】 于晓琪；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 恢复性司法是西方近三十年发展起来的一种刑事司法模式,其产生源于刑罚功能的变迁和被害人保护运动的兴起,是在反思传统司法的基础上产生、发展起来的一种新型司法模式。它蕴含着被害人、被告人、社区利益平衡构想与恢复社会关系的司法理念,体现了保障人权、程序正义、公平价值等基本司法理念的精髓,引发了一场在国际刑事司法领域的革新运动,成为近几年刑事法学界的一个热门话题,也是一个不成熟的话题。本文从恢复性司法的基本理论,其与传统司法模式的比较和恢复性司法模式在我国的司法实践中出现的几个问题入手,客观审视,理性思考,认为恢复性司法模式是对传统司法的有益补充,并非传统刑事司法的必然替代物,合理吸纳有益于中国刑事司法制度的完善和发展。更多还原

【Abstract】 Restorative Justice is a kind of criminal judicature developed in the west in the past 30 years. It is a new kind of judicature that originates from the shift of criminal punishment and the movement of "protecting the criminal victims" and retrospects on the traditional judicature. It implies the concept of the balance among the victim (s) , the accused, the community interests and the restoration of social relations, and embodies the fundamental judicial principles of the protection of human rights, the justice of procedures and the justice of value. It triggers a new round of innovations in the field of criminal judicature, thus becomes a hot topic in the related academic area in the past several years. By surveying related theories and our legal practice, the article argues that Restorative Justice is a helpful complement to, but not a replacement of, our traditional judicature. Reasonably adoption of Restorative Justice will benefit the perfection of China’s criminal judicature system and its development.更多还原