【作者】 陈华荣；

【导师】 杨卫东；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 体育人文社会学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 本研究通过文献检索法、比较分析法和案例分析法,较全面的探讨了禁令在职业体育中的适用历史、现状和前景。文章主体部分从五个方面展开论证:1.禁令简述;2.禁令与职业体育救济;3.禁令适用于职业体育的一般理论;4.禁令适用于职业体育的特殊问题;5.禁令在中国职业体育领域的适用前瞻。在此基础上得出结论。禁令是“一种衡平法性质的法律救济方法,据此可以命令某个人不得从事某种行为(限制性禁令);或命令其从事特定行为或事情(命令性禁令)。”在系统介绍了禁令制度后,文章以禁令与职业体育的内在逻辑关系为切入点,广泛讨论了禁令适用于职业体育的适用标准、适用范围、发布机构、适用理由、形式要件以及颁发禁令后的影响和不执行禁令的法律后果等,并继续深入探究禁令在职业体育领域的管辖权、执行权,禁令与“用尽体育行业内部救济”,司法机构与体育管理机构的权力冲突等等问题。作为一种借鉴和参考,本研究也涉及了禁令在我国职业体育中的适用前瞻。研究认为追求快节奏、高效率的现代职业体育和拖沓、冗长的普通司法程序实在无法相容。勉强适用普通司法程序,也会极大的冲击体育追求“更快、更高、更强”的传统,破坏体育运动中特有的运动周期和运动规律。禁令和职业体育的结合是由本质的内在需要决定的。职业体育具有时间性、竞争性、品牌性和相对封闭性特征,职业体育领域限于运动周期、运动生命和赛事赛制等因素制约,必然要求方便、迅速、公正和有效的解决该领域发生的争议,而禁令救济的衡平性、临时性和灵活性则可以满足这样的需求。禁令以其司法决定的即时阻断作用,使得职业体育争议的当事双方可以冷静下来:体育公共管理组织反思自己决定的程序和实体正当性,体育运动的参与者获得宝贵的时间准备比赛、验证权利,而司法也以合理的方式监督了体育自治。在职业体育中适用禁令,对于运动员和俱乐部来说参加比赛远比经济利益要重要的多,失去比赛的机会也被认为是无可挽回的损失。对于体育组织来说,司法机关颁发的禁令很好的划清了司法管辖与体育自治的界限,以强大的国家权力来对抗粗暴的行业权力,使体育联盟组织反思,体育自治借此得到了有效的司法监督。更多还原

【Abstract】 The article comprehensively discusses the history, present situation and prospect of injunction usage in the professional sports by documentation retrieval, analyze of comparison and case analyze. The main body of the article includes: I.Brief introduction of injunction; II. Injunction and remedy in professional sports; III. Principles on injunction application in professional sports; IV. The special problems on injunction application in professional sports; V.The prospect of injunction application in professional sports. From the above, the article makes a conclusion.Injunction which can prohibit somebody from doing something (prohibitory injunction) or order him or her to do something (mandatory injunction) regarded as a remedy method of Equity. After introducing injunction systemically, the article starts with logical relationship between injunction and the professional sports and then discusses widely principles and range of injunction application in the professional sports, issue authority, application reason, form and effects of issuing injunction and legal results of refusing to obey Injunction and finally continues to probe into the jurisdiction and enforcement of injunction application in professional sports, relationship between Injunction and Exhaustion All Internal Remedies and conflicts between justice authority and sports management authority and so on. As a reference, the article relates to the prospect of injunction application in the professional sports.The article thinks that the sluggish and lengthy common judicial procedure can not adapt to the fast and efficient modern professional sports. Reluctantly applying common judicial procedure will does harm to the tradition of“the faster, the higher and the stronger”and affect negatively the period and law of sports. The essential need determines that Injunction must be combined with the professional sports. The professional sports characterized by time, competence, brand and relatively closing and limited by the period, the span of sports and the system of match requires that problems can be resolved conveniently, quickly, efficiently and justly. Fortunately, Injunction possessing the characteristics of equity, temporary and flexibility can satisfy the above need. Injunction having the advantage of immediate and interdiction can help calm down two sides who conflict with each other in sports, make the sports authority reflect on the justness of its procedure and entity and also can make athletes have enough time to attend matches and validate their rights and at the same time justice finishes supervising the sports.According to injunction, for athletes and clubs, it is worse to lose opportunities of attending matches than losing money. For the sports organizations, injunction issued by judicial authority makes a clear distinction between judicial domination and sports autonomy, make the strong state power confront with the brutal industry power and finally make the sports organizations reflect. From the above, sports autonomy obtain the efficient judicial supervision.更多还原