【作者】 吴世永；

【导师】 孙文宪；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 文艺学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 本文的研究目的就是通过对德国著名思想家、哲学家哈贝马斯交往行为理论产生的历史语境和文化语境的溯源,交往行为理论及其延伸的三种“间性”的分析,探讨其对当代诗学的影响和启示。就交往行为理论本身而言,无论是从国外学者的专著中,还是从国内学者的研究论述中,不难发现他们多是从哲学、社会学意义上考察哈氏理论,而从思想史、文化哲学角度出发的研究成果是非常有限的。这恰恰是本文要具体展开的理论空间。应该说,哈氏的交往行为理论对于解答20世纪的文化危机提供了独特的视角。20世纪人类所面临的文化危机恰好是个体性的困境(异化)和理性化(公共性)的危机。哈氏的交往行为理论通过交往的合理化,重建以主体性和理性化为核心的现代性,对抗后现代主义对现代性的消解,在现代文化批判理论中独树一帜。本文拟解决的关键问题是厘清哈氏交往行为理论的几个核心理论命题,即梳理并阐述哈氏对主体间性、互文性、文化间性等几个诗学核心范畴所作的独到的理论建构,从而凸现出哈氏理论在诗学方面的主要贡献。本篇论文共分六个部分来进行论述。引言:简单介绍哈贝马斯的生平、学术经历和思想发展阶段。第一章:交往行为理论提出的历史语境和文化语境。本章认为哈氏交往行为理论的产生起源于晚期资本主义时期,起源于晚期资本主义的危机。而导致哈氏提出交往行为理论的文化语境有三:一是早期法兰克福学派批判理论陷入危机;二是对现代性的深刻反思,哈氏认为现代性是一项未完成的计划;三是重建历史唯物主义,重建历史唯物主义理论是哈氏早期批判理论的重要组成部分,也是他建构交往行为理论的铺路石。第二章:主体间性与交往行为理论。本章主要梳理何谓主体间性?主体间性理论的发展历史;哈贝马斯对主体间性的主要观点以及主体间性理论在诗学中的涵义及本质的规定性。第三章:互文性与交往行为理论。本章主要梳理何谓互文性?互文性理论的发展历史;哈贝马斯理解的互文性以及互文性理论在诗学中的地位和作用。第四章:文化间性与交往行为理论。本章主要梳理何谓文化间性?文化间性理论的发展历史;哈贝马斯与文化间性问题;文化间性理论在是诗学中地位和作用。结语:交往行为理论对诗学建构的总体性评价。本文结论认为要想深入研究诗学,就必须进行和坚持交往意义上的主体间性、互文性和文化间性等综合研究,冲决一切人为的,曾经是神圣不可侵犯的界限,在各种边缘的重叠交合之中,在不同文化的人们的视野融合的基础上,寻求新的起点,创造新的未来。总的来说,哈贝马斯的交往行为理论运用到诗学上来,旨在建立起一种对话性的诗学概念。本文采用的主要研究方法有:历史研究法、比较研究法、理论研究法。本文的特色与创新之处在于:1、把哈氏的交往行为理论放在20世纪最后20年后现代的思想进程中,研究哈氏交往行为理论不能离开20世纪思想史的宏大视野。2、国内外的同类研究多是从哲学、社会学意义上考察哈氏理论,而从思想史、文化哲学角度出发的研究成果非常有限。本文拟从文化哲学角度入手探讨哈氏的交往行为理论对诗学的建构性意义。3、通过对诗学几个核心概念、核心理论的比较和分析研究,确立哈氏不同于其他理论家的独特之处。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper is supposed to discuss tentatively the influence of the great German thinker and philosopher, Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action upon Poetics by tracing to the origin of the historical and cukural contexts of the theory, analyzing the nature and the three extended "interrelationships" of the theory. As far as Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action is concerned, it is easy to observe that in the monograghs published abroad and the studies issued domestically, the authors have been mostly studying the philosophical and social values of the theory, while those who have touched the ideological and cultural significance of it are few. The margin in the achievements offers the theoretical space of the current study. It is safe to say that Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action provides a unique perspective to respond to the 20^th century cultural crisis. The cultural crisis people in the 20^th century are confronted with is just the crisis of individualistic dilemma （alienation） and the crisis of rationality （communality）. Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action has reconstructed modernity with the core of subjectivity and rationality, by means of which it has resisted the deconstruction of Post-Modernism to Modernism. This theory therefore is uniquely distinguished among the theories of modern cultural criticism. This paper’s essential concern is to interpret several core theoretical propositions, that is, to expound Habermas’s unique theoretical construction of the core of poetics such as intersubjectivity, intertextuality and interculturality, etc.. Hereby, Habermas’s contribution to poetics will be highlighted.This paper consists of the following six parts.The Introduction briefly describes the life ,the academic experiences and the thought development of Habermas.Chapter One holds that Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action originates from the late capitalist period and the late capitalist crisis and the cultural contexts of its origin are as follows: the early critical theory of Frankfort School being in crisis; the deep reflection on modernity, which is thought to be an unexpected plan; the reconstruction of materialism, an important part of the early critical theory of Habermas, which paves the way for his Theory of Communicative Action.Chapter Two discusses what intersubjectivity is, its developing history, Habermas’s viewpoints on intersubjectivity and its meaning and nature in Poetics.Chapter Three discusses what intertextuality is, its developing history, Habermas’s viewpoints on intertextuality and its status and role in Poetics.Chapter Four discusses what interculturality is, its developing history, Habermas’s viewpoints on interculturality and its status and role in Poetics.The Conclusion holds that a comprehensive study should be made on intersubjectivity, intertextuality and interculturality in the communicative sense in order that we can make a deeper study on Poetics. We should break through everything artificial and once sacred and look for a new start and create a new future in the overlap of all margins and on the basis of the combinations of people’s perspectives in different cultures. To sum up, Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action is applied to Poetics in order to create a dialogue Poetics.The following study approaches are to be employed by this paper: historical studies, comparative studies and theoretical approach.The originality of this paper lies in:1.It puts Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action in the background of the ideological development in the last two decades of the 20^th century, for the studying of the theory can not be separated from the broad perspective of the 20^th century ideological history;2. It intends to discuss tentatively the constructive values of Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action upon Poetics, because the achievements of similar studies issued domestically and abroad are mostly concerned about the philosophical and social values of the theory, while those who have touched the ideological and cultural significance of it are few;3. It establishes Habermas’s originality in comparison with other theorists by comparing and analyzing some central concepts and theories in poetics.更多还原