【作者】 代伯亮；

【导师】 李振江；

【作者基本信息】 河南大学 ， 刑法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 盗窃罪源于古代刑法的“窃盗”,是我国历史上最早出现并沿用至今的罪名之一,也是各个时期最为普遍的多发性犯罪。盗窃罪一直受到我国刑法学界的关注,但在我国经济高速发展及社会正处于转型期、新型盗窃犯罪不断涌现的新形势下,我国刑法对盗窃罪的规定就显得相对简单和不足。盗窃犯罪行为由于极具复杂性,实践中产生了很多理论和实践难题。有关盗窃罪的认定和处理出现了种种分歧,相同的案例由不同法院审理则出现不同的结果,这些都损害了法律的权威和法度的统一。因此,笔者在借鉴前人研究的基础上,拟对盗窃犯罪争议较大的一些有关定罪量刑的疑难问题作一深入的探讨和研究,以期对刑法理论有所丰富,对司法实践有所帮助。本文采用理论联系实际的方法,对盗窃罪的相关问题进行了深入地探讨和研究,提出了笔者的观点,并对法律的修改和完善提出了建议。全文除引言和结语外共分为以下四个部分:第一部分:盗窃罪概述。该部分论述了我国及国外盗窃罪立法的历史沿革、新中国刑法对盗窃罪规定的变革以及盗窃罪的构成特征。本文对盗窃罪相关问题的研究就是从盗窃罪的立法考察开始,而逐步展开的。第二部分:盗窃罪相关疑难问题。该部分是本文论述的重点,是本文的主体,共分为以下六个方面:第一方面,盗窃罪的犯罪对象问题。本文考察了中外各种犯罪对象理论及国外相关立法例,评述了理论界关于犯罪对象的学说,阐明了笔者自己的观点,并对困扰理论及实务界的一些疑难问题进行了论证。第二方面,盗窃罪既遂标准问题。针对中外理论界争议较大的有关既遂和未遂标准进行评议,论述了“控制说”的合理性;结合法律规定和相关司法解释对各类盗窃逐个进行分析、研究。第三方面,盗窃数额的计算问题。首先阐述了盗窃数额在定罪量刑中的地位和作用;然后根据法律规定和相关司法解释,确定了盗窃数额计算的一般原则,并对盗窃对象按普通物品、特殊物品、有价证券、信用卡、增值税发票等标准进行分类,逐一研究其计算方法;还对盗窃后销赃数额、多次盗窃和重复盗窃数额的计算,共犯数额的计算等问题进行了深入的探讨。第四方面,盗窃罪“数额较大”和“多次盗窃”的认定。阐述了“数额较大”和“多次盗窃”的含义及认定标准,阐明了笔者的观点。第五方面,针对实践中出现的盗窃数额标准的区域冲突问题进行探讨,阐述了产生的原因,论证了解决方案。第六方面,对盗窃罪和相关易混犯罪的界限进行研究,鉴别了盗窃罪和其它相关易混淆犯罪的异同,以便在实践中准确辨别此罪与彼罪,正确定罪和量刑。第三部分:论述了笔者关于盗窃罪死刑存废问题的思考。随着社会文明程度的不断提高和刑事法治文明的深入发展,对死刑的限制和废除已成为世界发展趋势。像盗窃罪这种非暴力犯罪应否适用死刑,引起了刑法理论界和实务界越来越密切的关注,死刑在盗窃罪适用上的存在价值受到广泛质疑。对此,经过可行性分析,笔者阐明了自己的观点:即在我国废除盗窃罪死刑适用是切实可行的。第四部分:该部分阐述了盗窃罪的修改与完善问题。针对刑法规定比较简单,存在的一些疏漏、缺陷和不足,远不能适应我国当前打击盗窃犯罪和保障社会主义建设需要的现状,提出一些修改和补充建议,以求完善法律,捍卫法律尊严和法度统一。更多还原

【Abstract】 The crime of theft originated from qiedao ,one of the oldest forms of infringing upon possessions in China history. As one of the most occurred crimes in all periods, theft has always caught much attention from scholars in the criminal jurisprudence in China. The stipulations about theft seem relatively simple and inadequate during a time of economy booming and social transition , especially under the situation of frequent occurences of brand-new crimes of theft. Thus there occurs many theoretical and judicial problems from judicial practice owing to the complexity of theft , which harms the authority and integrity of criminal law. Based on similar researches in the past, this thesis is intended to conduct a detailed research on some disputed complex problems in order to enrich the criminal theory and offer a solution to issues arising from judicial practice.This thesis is written combining theory with practice, discussing the relevant issues of theft in depth to put up with author’s standpoint and proposing proposals to the improvement and consummation of criminal law. This thesis is composed of four parts.Part one summarizes the lawmaking history of theft at home and abroad, the changes about stipulations of theft with criminal law in People’s Republic of China. And the study on relevant issues of theft is carried out initially by means of surveying the lawmaking history of theft.Part two is the core of this thesis and can be devided into six sections. In the first section, the study on theft targets is conducted. The suthor surveys all kinds of theft targets at home and abroad and cases of lawmaking abroad to analysize views of theft targets and draw conclusions about that. The author goes on with some complex issues puzzled by schollars in the criminal jurisprudence and judicial practice. In the second section, the author analysizes the standards for differing accomplished and attempted offences which arouses disputes in theoretical fields at home and abroad, and agrees that“control theory”is well grounded. The third section involves the calculation of theft number. Taking law and relevant interpretations as reference, the common rule of calculation is determined and vavious theft targets, such as regular possessions, special possessions, valued bonds, credit cards,invoices etc., are classified and calculated by their nature. In the fourth section, the author deals with the number of theft and theft for more than one time, setting standards for them. And then, the view of point is provided in order to solve problems in judicial practice. In the fifth section, the author aims at the regional conflicts arising from the standards of theft number in judicial practice and the reason is explored and solution for that is raised. Last section aims at theoretically differing theft from other similar crimes, and it’s rather difficult to distinguish theft from other similar crimes sometimes in judicial practice. The author explores the differences between the crimes and offers his own opinions as to how to tell one crime from another in judicial practice.Part three deals with the issue of usage of death penalty. It’s been a worldwide trend to restrict and abolish death penalty with the development of society and criminal civilization. As a non-violent crime, the usage of death penalty arouses heated discussion and controversy both in theoretical fields and judicial practice. The author points out clearly that it’s practical to abolish the usage of death penalty for theft.Part four deals with such issues as improvement and consummation about lawmaking of theft. In this part, the author aims at inadequacy about the lawmaking of theft to crack down the crime of theft and defend socialist construction as well as upholding the authority and integrity of law.更多还原