【作者】 周慧达；

【导师】 龚向和；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 公民受教育权的救济是公民受教育权保护的最后屏障,在体系化的救济制度中,受教育权才能得到有效的保障。受教育权法律救济制度体系主要指各种受教育权法律救济方式组成一个动态、连接有序的有机系统。西方许多国家以及我国台湾地区都已经建立了比较合理的公民受教育权法律救济制度体系,并在实践中取得良好的社会效果。然而在我国,受教育权法律救济制度体系却远未完善,重构公民受教育权救济制度体系是充分保障作为基本权利的受教育权的当务之急。在我国现行的法律规定中,受教育权法律救济制度体系包括非诉救济制度和诉讼救济制度两个主要方面。其中非诉救济制度主要包括教育申诉制度和教育行政复议制度,诉讼救济制度包括教育民事诉讼救济制度、教育行政诉讼救济制度和教育刑事诉讼救济制度。然而,各种制度以及制度之间在衔接上都存在明显的缺陷,主要表现为国家本位的立法目的、教育立法的不完备以及受教育权救济制度设计的不合理。这些缺陷的产生既有理论上的原因,也受现实因素的影响。为了加强我国公民受教育权的保护和救济,必须重构我国公民受教育权救济制度体系。完善我国公民受教育权救济制度体系,需要在吸收借鉴域外先进经验与更新受教育权救济理念的基础之上,从我国公民受教育权救济制度体系的现状出发,做三方面的努力:首先,对现有的受教育权非诉与诉讼救济制度进行必要的修正;其次,创建教育仲裁制度、受教育权公益诉讼制度以及受教育权宪法诉讼救济制度;再次,加强各具体受教育权救济制度之间的系统化。更多还原

【Abstract】 The relief of citizens’ right to education is the final barriers of protecting a citizens’ right to education. In the relief system of the right to education,the right to education can get a effective protection possibly. The right to education system of legal remedies mainly refers to various institutions of legal remedy ,which formed a dynamic link between and orderly system. Many Western countries and China’s Taiwan all have established a more reasonable citizens’the right to education system of legal remedies, and has made a good social effect in practice. However, in our country, the right to education system of legal remedies are far from perfect. we rebuild the relief system of the right to education systems, which is a top priority to the right to education ,as fundamental human rights.In our country ,the existing legal provisions,the relief system of the right to education is consisted of two main aspects , including the non-litigation remedies institutions and the litigation institutions. The non-litigation remedies instuitions which mainly include the administration remedy and the review remedy to right to education .At the same time ,the litigation remedies institutions are consisted of the education civil remedy institution, the educational and administrative proceedings remedy institution and the educational Criminal remedy institution. However,three obvious flaws lie in the various remedies institution .firstly, the purpose of legislation of the relief system is based on nativelism. Secondly, the education legislation is not complete. Thirdly, the remedies institutions are designed unreasonable. Both the theoretical reasons and the real factors which lead to the relief system of the right to education is not complete we should rebuild the relief system of the right to education as soon as possible.In order to strengthen the protection of the right to education ,in Oder to relief the right to education, the relief system of citizens’the right to education must be reconstructed in our country. To improve the relief of the right to education in our country, we must absorb and learn from the advanced experience outside .we must also accept the updated concept of the right to education on the basis of relief. From the status quo of the relief system of the right to education systems of in our country,we do the efforts in three areas. First of all, the existing non-litigation remedy institutions and the litigation remedy institutions of right to education should be amend necessarily;Secondly, the arbitration institution of the right to education, the right to education public interest litigation institution of the right to education and the right to education of constitutional litigation institution of the right to education should be consructed;Thirdly, to strengthen the specific right to education relief institution ,which is important to rebuild a systematic relief system of the right to education.更多还原