【作者】 孙艳；

【导师】 许光耀；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 法律， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 世界进入了一个前所未有的知识经济年代,知识产权权利人的权利也越来越受到了重视和保护。可是,随着技术贸易的普遍化,我们也发现,在我们加强知识产权保护的同时,知识产权滥用问题也愈发凸现出来。在技术许可合同中,权利人常常会设定一些不公平的条款,这些不公平条款妨碍了正常的市场竞争,已经构成了知识产权的滥用。发达国家在这方面己经有较为完备的法律或行政法规,美国、欧盟和日本等发达国家对技术许可协议中限制竞争条款的规制的立法以及模式不尽相同,但都是在反垄断法的框架下进行的,并且其趋势也是一致的。各国在对于知识产权与反垄断的关系上都己经认识到两者并不存在根本的对立,知识产权制度从根木上也是鼓励创新、促进竞争的,所以知识产权的行使并不因此而受到反垄断法的特别关注,相反,发达国家反垄断政策对此是趋于宽松。虽然我国已经颁布了最新的垄断法,但各方面都不太完善。本文单独对技术许可合同中可能出现的某些限制竞争问题进行探讨。在对美国、欧盟和日本的立法进行比较的基础上就技术许可合同中可能出现的各种限制性条款进行具体分析,并对我国的反垄断法的完善提出了自己的一些建议。同时本文还认为行政机关可以制定详细的指南来指导企业间技术许可合同的制定。更多还原

【Abstract】 This is an intellectual-economy society, interests of the owners of intellectual property rights have been attached more importance to . But with the wide-spreading of technology trade, we can see that when the protection of intellectual property is strengthened, the abuse of intellectual property rights become more common. In the license contract for technology, the owner of intellectual property right often institutes some qualifying clauses, which create obstacles to competition.Though developed countries such as the United States, the European Union and Japan regulate restrictive trade practice by different laws and in different legislative models, all of them regulate it under anti-monopoly law. The legislative trends of the developed countries are identical too. The developed countries recognized that the legislative targets of intellectual property law and antimonopoly law are not opposite. The target of intellectual property law is to promote competition and to encourage creation. So the enforcement of intellectual right can not be paid extraordinary attention to. Now the most important task is the improvement of the antimonopoly law of China.The paper analyzed various common restrictive clauses, which are based on the compassion among the laws of the developed countries. The article also makes some advice on how to improve the antimonopoly law.更多还原