【作者】 融天明；

【导师】 寿步；

【作者基本信息】 上海交通大学 ， 民商法学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 在法学方法论意义上,类型化是指以事物的共同意义为核心,将具有共同外部特征的事物归为一类并形成规范类型。通过规范类型与社会生活事实的对比,将具有相似特征和意义的事实归类于该规范类型,并受同一规制。类型化思维相对于概念思维的僵化性、封闭性,具有开放性。在立法和司法中,类型化思维有着重要意义。由于知识产权法发展的历史过程中体系化不足,以及在经济全球化背景下,知识产权国际协调中强势利益集团的作用所导致的学术理性的匮乏,知识产权法存在着严重的类型化不足问题。这一问题直接导致了两方面的司法困境:一是在司法实践中存在着知识产权法定主义和自然权利主义两种司法理念的对立;二是由于知识产权类型化不足,司法中类推适用方法缺失,法官往往倾向于通过对法律原则的滥用来解决案件。解决这样的司法困境,知识产权法研究应向民法回归,借鉴民法理论,特别是民法方法论理论,在理论和立法上完善知识产权类型。同时,在民法整体视野下,建立知识产权请求权和针对不法行为的债权请求权(包括侵害知识性利益的债权请求权)制度,并通过和周边民法制度配合,达到既对知识产权及应受保护的知识性利益周密保护,又不随意扩张知识产权客体或权能之目的。更多还原

【Abstract】 Typology refers to a method by which different things will be treated as criterion type according to their common meaning and external character. By comparing the facts in social life with the criterion type, those facts which have the same meaning and external character shall be included in such criterion type and be governed by the same rules. The typological thinking has the character of no-limitation comparing with the character of conception thinking. Typological thinking has important functions in legislation and justice.In intellectual property rights, the insufficiency of typology is a serious problem caused by the insufficiency of systematism during the history of intellectual property rights and the lack of sense in academic research effected by powerful interested group in international cooperation , which leads to two dilemmas in justice: firstly, there is a contradiction between the statutory principle and the natural rights principle; secondly, China courts tend to abuse the principle to judge the cases because of the lack of justice method: the application of analogy.To solve these dilemmas and to achieve the aims of protecting the intellectual property rights and the intellectual property interests without extending the objects and contents, the academic research of intellectual property law should return to methodology of civil law. The intellectual property rights claim and the claim of infringing the intellectual property interests should be formulated, and the cooperation of related civil law system should be emphasized, under the integrity view of civil law.更多还原