【作者】 朱挺；

【导师】 叶永禄；

【作者基本信息】 上海交通大学 ， 法律， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 撤销仲裁裁决是对仲裁进行司法审查的重要方式。根据我国最高人民法院发布的一系列司法解释,人民法院对于撤销仲裁裁决案件的司法审查实行一审终审制度,但是这一制度显然已同程序公正和当事人享有公正审判请求权等司法审查制度的价值不相适宜。对于人民法院作出的错误的撤销仲裁裁决或者驳回当事人撤销申请的裁定,当事人是否享有救济权以及如何行使救济权,笔者就此问题提出一些粗浅探讨。本文首先论述了设立撤销仲裁裁决司法审查不当救济制度的哲学基础和现实基础,评判现行救济制度的基本特征,剖析我国现行撤销仲裁裁决司法审查救济制度存在的“公正”与“效率”两种法律价值的冲突以及不足。通过比较域外仲裁发达国家的相关立法例,建议在修订我国《仲裁法》时予以借鉴,并结合我国民事诉讼二审终审、审判监督的基本原则,赋予当事人在一定范围内享有提起上诉或者申请再审的权利,从而平衡“公正”与“效率”两种法律价值,促进我国仲裁司法审查制度的完善以及维护当事人的合法权益。更多还原

【Abstract】 Repealing rulings is an important way of judicial review on arbitration. A series of interpretations of the Supreme Court’s have implemented a system of first instance being the final in the course of the review. This system is obviously unharmonious with such values as procedural impartiality, the right to fair trial, etc., in judicial review. The writer probed in this article into the issues about whether the parties have and how to exercise the right of relief against wrong judicial decisions of repealing arbitration rulings or refusing to do so. Firstly, he discussed the philosophical and realistic foundation of the system of relief against improper judicial decisions of repealing arbitration rulings. Then he evaluated the basic characters of the country’s current system, and analyzed the conflict between and the shortage of the two legal values, i.e., fairness and efficiency, in this system. Finally, after comparing some advanced foreign models of arbitration legislation, he suggested that the country’s new arbitration law should allow the parties to appeal a judgment or apply for a retrial in line with the basic principles of the two-tier trial system and the trial supervision procedure in civil litigation. Such a revision will help to balance the values of fairness and efficiency, promote the system of judicial review on arbitration and protect the lawful right of the parties.更多还原