【作者】 刘国峰；

【导师】 牟宪魁；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 民事审判监督程序是我国民事诉讼程序的重要组成部分，是民事审判程序中的补救程序，因其审理的对象是已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定，而具有其自身的特点。由于现行《民事诉讼法》对民事审判监督程序的规定过于原则，审判程序不完整、不严密，致使人民法院审判实践中再审程序无程序可循，引发了“当事人不停申诉，人民法院无限再审”等弊端。本文从理论与实践的结合入手，对现行民事审判监督程序进行了批判，并提出了重构民事审判监督程序的指导思想、基本原则和改革路径。全文除导语外，共分六个部分。一、我国现行民事审判监督程序的主要特点。本部分分析了审判监督程序的一般特征，我国现行民事审判监督程序的立法现状，并对这一现状进行了评价。二、现行民事审判监督程序的缺陷和弊端分析。本部分对现行民事审判监督程序的立法指导思想和价值取向进行了分析，并详细列举出现行民事审判监督程序的种种缺陷。三、民事审判监督程序的存在价值分析。本部分深入分析了民事审判监督程序所具有的权利救济的作用和权力制约的作用，并指出良性的再审程序能够维护司法权威，推动司法进步，进而论证了审判监督程序存在的必要性。四、西方法治中的再审制度及启示。本部分从再审事由、提起再审的期限、再审的管辖法院、再审之诉的效力等方面介绍了西方法治中的再审制度设计及其对完善我国再审制度的借鉴意义。五、完善民事审判监督程序的基本原则。本部分详细了论述了完善我国民事审判监督制度应当坚持实事求是、依法纠错的原则；正当程序正义原则：维护生效裁判既判力的原则六、民事审判监督制度改革的路径。本部分以完善再审程序的基本原则为指导，指出完善我国民事再审程序应当确立以当事人诉权为基础的“再审之诉”的制度、再审符合法定事由的制度、限制检察院再审监督权的制度、及时申请再审的制度、申请再审不停止执行的制度和法定审判监督程序审查制度，从而为重构民事审判监督程序提出了改革路径。更多还原

【Abstract】 The cival procedure for Trial Supervision is the important part of cival procedure in our country and it’s remediable procedure of the cival procedure for Trial .Because the trial objects are the judgment and order which have taken legal effect, the cival procedure for Trial Supervision has its own characteristics.Because the provision of the cival procedure for Trial Supervision is so principled in the current civil procedure law that civil case judgment direct procedure of provision too principled, judgment procedure not integrity, not tight, cause court of the people judgment practice medium discuss again procedure have no the procedure can follow and caused "the party concerned don’t stop to report, the court of the people be infinite to discuss again" etc. irregularity.This text commence from the combine of theories and practice, rightness current civil case judgment direct the procedure carried on judgment, and put forward heavy Gou civil case judgment direct procedure of instruction thought, basic principle and reform path.In addition to preface, the full text be total cent six part.First, the our country is current civil case judgment direct procedure of main characteristics.This part analysis judgment direct procedure of general characteristic, our country current civil case judgment direct procedure of lawmaking present condition, and carried on evaluation to this present condition.Second, current civil case judgment direct blemish and irregularity of the procedure analysis.This part to current civil case judgment direct procedure of lawmaking instruction thought and value the mindset carried on analysis, and detailed enumerate to appear line civil case judgment direct procedure of various blemish.Third, civil case judgment direct procedure of existence value analysis.This part was thorough analysis civil case judgment direct procedure have of right succour of the function of function and power check and supervision, and point out to positively discuss again procedure can maintenance judicatory authority, push judicatory progress, then argument judgment necessity that inspect procedure’s existence.Forth, west rule of law in of discuss again system and apocalypse.This part is from discuss again origin of matter and bring up to discuss again of the term, discuss again of rule over a court and discuss again it to tell of the effect etc. the introduction the west the rule of law of discuss again system design and it rightness perfect our country discuss again system of draw lessons from meaning.Fifth, perfect civil case judgment direct the basic principle of the procedure.This part detailed discuss perfect our country civil case judgment direct system should persistence practical and realistic, correct a wrong principle by law;Proper procedure justice principle;The maintenance take effect to judge since judge the principle of dintSixth, civil case judgment direct system reform of path origin part with perfect discuss again the basic principle of procedure for instruction, point out perfect our country the civil case discuss again procedure should establishment with the party concerned tell power for foundation of the system of "discuss again it tell", discuss again system according to legal origin of matter, restriction check the Cha hospital discuss again direct power of system, in time application discuss again of system, application discuss again not stop performance of system and legal judgment direct procedure reviewing system, thus for heavy Gou civil case judgment direct the procedure put forward reform path.更多还原