【作者】 蒋璐；

【导师】 熊永明；

【作者基本信息】 南昌大学 ， 刑法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 本文以“胁迫罪纲要”为题，从胁迫罪的刑事立法入手，探讨了胁迫罪的法益，胁迫的概念及胁迫行为的特征，胁迫罪的犯罪停止形态等，以期对我国的刑事立法、刑事司法和刑事理论研究有所裨益。全文除引言、结论外，共分为三章内容。第一章是胁迫罪的立法。主要介绍英美刑法、大陆刑法和中国刑法有关胁迫罪的立法状况，在此基础上对各国立法进行比较。第二章是胁迫罪的基本问题。主要介绍了胁迫罪的法益，胁迫的概念与特征及胁迫罪的犯罪停止形态。从法益的基本含义出发，胁迫罪所保护的应当是被告人所侵犯的人身自由，特别是意志决定自由；外国刑事理论中胁迫存在广义、狭义、最狭义三种含义上的分歧。在分析的基础上，胁迫是指威胁他人，使他人基于恐惧心理实施一定作为或不作为。且分析了胁迫罪的紧迫性、加害对象、加害范围等；从着手理论出发，简单分析了胁迫罪的犯罪停止形态。第三章是胁迫罪的立法完善。主要探讨在立法中如何完善我国胁迫罪的规定。为了更好地保护公民的人身权利尤其是公民的精神安宁，我国应当把情节严重的胁迫规定为胁迫罪，以贯彻对个人权利的最佳保护。更多还原

【Abstract】 The thesis, titled with "Outline of the Crime of Coercion", explores legal rights of crime of coercion, the concept of coercion, features of coercing behaviors and desistance forms of the crime of coercion, in the purposing of being useful for criminal legislation, criminal judicature and criminal theory in China. The main part of the thesis is divided into three parts besides the parts of introduction and conclusion.Chapter one involves the legislation of the crime of coercion, which mainly illustrates the legislation situation in the British and American criminal law, Mainland criminal law and Chinese criminal law and makes comparison one another. Chapter two refers to basic problems of the crime of coercion, introducing its legal rights, its concept, features and desistance forms. On the basis of basic denotation of legal rights, the violated personal freedom, especially that will determines freedom, should be protected by the crime of coercion. In the criminal theory abroad, there exists difference among three denotations of coercion from the broad, narrow, the narrowest senses. On the basis of analysis, coercion means threatening others and making them conduct or non-conduct due to fright. It analyzes the urgency of crime of coercion, offended subject and offended scope and it also make a brief analysis of desistance form of offense from theoretical basis.Chapter three refers to the legislation improvement of the crime of coercion, elaborating how to improve the regulation of it in legislation in China. In order to better protect citizens’ personal rights, especially mental peace, our law should define the serious coercion as the crime of coercion to achieve the best protection of personal right.更多还原