【作者】 袁晨颖；

【导师】 钟筱红；

【作者基本信息】 南昌大学 ， 经济法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 倾销是一种通过向进口国以低于正常价值的出口价格输送产品，迅速而大量地占领进口国市场竞争的手段。随着国际贸易的发展，不少国家频繁采用反倾销方法，以反倾销之名，行贸易保护之实，国际贸易发展也受到一定程度的遏制。近年来，倾销与反倾销手段使用的范围日趋广泛，频率越来越高，各国倾销与反倾销的矛盾不断激化，相关争端不断涌现，引起了人们的关注。世贸组织为成员解决这些争端提供了场所，《反倾销协定》和《关于争端解决规则与程序的谅解》以及相关机构为反倾销争端的有效解决提供了保障。随着WTO争端解决机制的不断完善，提交给争端解决机构的反倾销诉讼案件越来越多，越来越多的成员国在WTO提供的协议框架下据理力争，维护本国的贸易利益。本文采用以理论与实证分析相结合的方法，以国际法理论、比较法理论为指导，通过对条文及DSB已解决的反倾销争端案件进行分析，总结出WTO反倾销争端解决的内在规律，归纳出WTO反倾销法的法理基础，并探讨WTO争端解决机制在解决反倾销争端中发挥的作用。最后结合上面几章讨论的程序性问题，探讨我国在参与WTO反倾销争端解决时的一些建议和需注意的细节。全文主要分四个部分，其中第一部分简要介绍了WTO反倾销争端解决机制的概况；第二部分阐述了WTO反倾销案中专家组的职权范围；第三部分探讨了WTO反倾销案中的审查标准；第四部分结合以上对程序性问题的研究，提出我国在参与WTO反倾销争端解决时的一些建议和需注意的细节。更多还原

【Abstract】 Dumping is an important tool of competition, which is rational according to the explanation of economy. Along with the development of international trade, a number of countries take anti-dumping measures frequently. In name, they are exercising their right of anti-dumping, but in fact they are protecting home industries that slow down the development of international trade to some extent. Recently, dumping and anti-dumping are used more widely and frequently and the conflicts between dumping and anti-dumping become more and more severely. Those have drawn attention of many countries. World Trade organization (WTO) supplies a place for the member to settle disputes.《Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994》,《Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes》and the body concerning the disputes settlements all supply an guarantee to the dispute settlements.This article primarily uses the method of positivism analyzing and normal analyzing, guided by the theory of international law and comparative law, and though a comparative analysis of the articles and cases which have been settled by DSB, summarizes the inherent orderliness of WTO anti-dumping dispute settlement, sums up the rationale of anti-dumping law of WTO and discusses the functions of WTO dispute settlement mechanism in anti-dumping dispute settlement.The paper comprises of four parts. The first part is "review on anti-dumping dispute settlement mechanism". The second part uses a lot of actual cases to explain the limits of experts group’s functions and powers. The second part uses a lot of actual cases to explain the limits of experts group’s functions and powers. The third part uses a lot of actual cases to explain the standard of experts group’s judgments. At the end of this article, according to above-mentioned analysis, bring forward suggestion.更多还原