【作者】 吴跃辉；

【导师】 魏东；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 法律， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 从改革开放以来，随着经济的发展和社会环境的变化，腐败问题日益严重，权钱交易、以权谋私的贿赂犯罪发案率居高不下，严重破坏了国家机关的形象，损害了人民群众对党的信任。腐败问题关系到党和国家的生死存亡，惩治贪污贿赂犯罪是反腐败的重要内容，也是国家赋予检察机关的重要职责。受贿罪作为贪污贿赂犯罪的重要组成部分，具有严重的社会危害性，一直是刑法理论研究的重点。受贿罪的理论问题相当丰富，本文仅就受贿罪的客观要件加以研究，从受贿罪的客体，受贿罪的对象，受贿罪的客观方面等三个大的方面作一些探讨，尤其，对性贿赂问题、贿赂与馈赠的差异、不正当利益的界定等方面提出了自己的见解。具体而言，本文的主要内容及笔者的主要观点包括以下几个方面：第一，本文的第一部分是有关受贿罪客体的探讨，通过对多种观点的分析，笔者认为受贿罪的客体是公众对国家工作人员职务行为所期待的公正性。第二，本文的第二部分是关于受贿罪的对象——贿赂。在这一部分，笔者主要探讨了贿赂的范围和性贿赂的相关问题。对于贿赂的范围，通过对立法沿革和理论界各种观点的分析，笔者提出要结合《联合国反腐败公约》对贿赂范围重新认定。对于性贿赂问题，笔者提出我国借鉴国外合理的立法模式，将性贿赂犯罪化，弥补我国关于性贿赂犯罪的立法缺陷。在本部分中，笔者还提出关于贿赂和馈赠的区分，应在围绕贿赂和馈赠各自特点的基础上进行考察。第三，本文的第三部分是受贿罪的客观方面。在这部分中，笔者主要探讨了利用职务便利和为他人谋取利益两个方面。笔者通过对立法变迁和区分普通受贿和斡旋受贿的不同情形，提出了相应的观点。首先，在普通受贿中，笔者认为有些情况下，行为人虽然不具有处理某事务的直接权力，但却利用职务上有隶属、制约关系的其他国家工作人员的职权，凭借自己因职权而产生的制约下属人员的便利条件，要求其他国家工作人员为请托人谋利益自己收受财物的，其实质仍是以自己职务为基础的，也应看作是利用了职务上的便利；其次，在斡旋受贿中，笔者赞成“影响说”，即利用本人职权或者地位形成的便利条件是指利用行为人职务对第三者产生非制约性的影响作用；再次，提出取消谋取利益的规定，以完善受贿罪的立法；最后，笔者认为依靠行贿手段排斥竞争对手、损害其他公平竞争者的利益来获取所谓不确定利益，是不正当利益。在界定不正当利益时，不仅要看实体利益，程序利益同样不可缺少，应将实体利益结合起来，二者不可偏废。更多还原

【Abstract】 Recently, as the development of economic and society,corruption is getting more ang more furiours and the rate of it is rather high, as a result, government’s reputation and people’s trust to society, punishing the corruption and bribe is rather necessary in striking against corruption and in punishing the official crime, also, it is a core duty of prosecutorial organization.There are various sides in theory research of the acceptance of bribe crime,the sphere that the author’s research is it’s objective condition, such as it’s object, objectibe elements and its offense target. Particularly, the auther puts forward his own opinion about the problems such as the sex bribe problem, the difference between bribe and presentation, etc.Concretely Er Yan , main the main body of the paper content and author’s main viewpoint include several the following aspect:First, Part I part of the main body of a book is investigation and discussion about crime of accepting bribe object, by the fact that the analysis , author to various viewpoint think that the crime of accepting bribe object is the public to justice expected by government staff members duty performance.Secondly, Part II part of the main body of the paper is the marriage partner bribery about crime of accepting bribe. Have discussed the bribery range and the nature bribery relevance problem mainly in this part, author. To the bribery range,by the fact that the analysis , author to legislation evolution and the various theory boundary viewpoint suggest that essential points combines "United Nations anti-corruption convention " to the bribery, range firmly believes that again. About sex bribe problem , author the legislation defect suggesting that our country uses the rational abroad legislation pattern for reference , nature is bribed to commit a crime-rization , makes up our country about that the nature bribery commits a crime to nature. In the part, the author brings forward the examination being in progress about the bribery and the differentiation presenting a gift to , responds to on the basis surrounding a bribery and presenting each a characteristic’s.Thirdly, Part III part of the main body of the paper is objective crime of accepting bribe aspect. In this part, the author has discussed the aspect making use of post to facilitate composing in reply two for others seeks benefit mainly. The author has passed to legislation changes and the different circumstance distinguishing average bribe-taking and mediating bribe-taking , has brought forward the corresponding viewpoint. The author thinks that some condition is lower , the behavior people is subordinate to , restricts relation’s though having on the post not having the authority handling some affair directness, but making use of but in first, depending on average bribe-taking, other, government staff members’s authority of office , the restraint convenient conditions of subordinate personnel relying self on coming into being because of authority of office, require that government staff members is that self recieve property’s other ask an influential person for help seeking benefit, please , still, it’s essence is to take self post as basis, also responds to look upon as be to have made use of upper facilitating of post; That secondly, the author approves of "affecting the convenient conditions saying authority of office or position making use of me namely takes form " in mediating bribe-taking, is to refer to the effect making use of behavior person post to produce the effect must restrict nature to "the third person"; Once again, suggest that canceling the regulation seeking benefit, legislation with perfect crime of accepting bribe; Finally, the author thinks that depending on the other impartial competitor’s to bribe a means discriminating against a competitor , damaging , is illegitimate benefit to come to gain so-called uncertain benefit benefit. During the period of the boundary fixes illegitimate benefit, not only needing to look at entity benefit, same forbidden is short of procedure benefit, should entity benefit be no combining with, Neither should be overemphasized at the expense of the other.更多还原