【作者】 赵淑霞；

【导师】 刘智慧；

【作者基本信息】 中国政法大学 ， 民商法学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 现代社会,动产价值增大,已成为许多公司法人甚至个人重要的财产。由于债务人设定质权必须移转占有,若以动产融资设定质押,债务人则无法对其财产加以利用。因此,既能有效利用动产财产又能满足动产做担保进行融资的需要使得动产抵押制度得以建立。但是动产抵押制度与传统物权法存在很多冲突和矛盾需要解决。我国的《担保法》中规定有动产抵押制度,但是规定的笼统、模糊、不易操作。刚刚通过的《物权法》对动产抵押制度也进行了规定,《物权法》在《担保法》的基础上对动产抵押制度进行了一定的改动,有很大的进步,但是《物权法》的部分规定还有其完善空间。本文拟就动产抵押制度进行研究,旨在对我国动产抵押制度的完善提供一些建议。文章除引言和结论外,共包括四个部分。第一部分主要是介绍动产抵押制度的历史沿革及功能。本部分运用历史分析方法对动产抵押制度进行了考察,并通过比较法的方法对世界上一些国家及地区的动产抵押立法例进行分析,从而对动产抵押制度的历史及现状有一个清晰的认识。动产抵押制度适应社会需要而产生,有其巨大的制度价值,我国应借鉴世界上其他国家或地区的相关立法以完善我国的动产抵押制度。第二部分主要是分析动产抵押制度与传统物权法的冲突。动产抵押制度的缺陷主要体现在动产抵押制度与传统物权法的冲突上,本部分主要分析了动产抵押制度与传统物权法体系的冲突,动产抵押制度与传统物权法公示、公信原则的冲突,动产抵押制度与动产交易受让人利益保护之间的冲突,动产抵押制度与其他动产担保物权的冲突等,以期对动产抵押制度与传统物权法之间的冲突有一个准确的认识。第三部分是本文的重点,主要是寻求解决动产抵押制度与传统物权法冲突的有效路径。本部分主要涉及以下几方面的内容:明确动产抵押制度的立法定位,限制动产抵押标的物范围,完善动产抵押公示制度,完善对抵押动产受让人的保护制度,明确动产抵押权与其他动产担保物权的效力顺位。第四部分主要是分析我国动产抵押制度的现状,并对我国动产抵押制度进行完善。通过分析我国动产抵押制度的现状,并结合对《担保法》及刚刚通过的《物权法》的分析,本文认为我国动产抵押制度尽管已日臻完善,但仍有值得商榷的地方,并针对具体问题提出自己的建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 At present, the chattels become more value. It has become people and the legal entity’s very important properties. The reasons of the creation of the option pledge which the debtor has to transfer the possession of his movables, and the movables financing which the debtor has to desert the application, make the establishment of the chattel mortgage system become requirement, but there are so many conflicts between the chattel mortgage and the traditional real right law. The Guaranty Law of the People’s Republic of China has generally staten the chattel mortgage system, but it can’t accommodate the development of the market economy of China. The Real Right Law of the People’s Republic of China on the basis of the Guaranty Law which exist some limitations has made the Chattel mortgage better. Under the discussion of the Chattel Mortgage System, the article submits some projects about how to improve the Chattel Mortgage System.This article consists four parts except the Introduction and the conclusion.Part One mainly introduces the general situation of the Chattel Mortgage System using comparison and analysis methods. By the cognition of the other areas and countries’the Chattel Mortgage System complete our country’s the Chattel Mortgage System.Part Two mainly analyzes the conflicts between the Chattel Mortgage System and the traditional Real Right Law including the conflicts between the Chattel Mortgage System and the traditional Real Right Law system, the traditional Public Summons model, Public Credit model, the well-meaner advantage in the movable transaction and the other security interests.Part Three is the key point, trying to find the effective method to settle the conflict between the Chattel Mortgage System and the traditional Real Right Law, including the definite legislation aim about the Chattel Mortgage System, the definite objects of pledge, the integrity of the Public Summons System and the preservation to the well-meaner transferee, and the force order of the Chattel Mortgage rights and the other movable hypothec rights.Part Four mainly introduces the actuality about the Chattel Mortgage System and makes suggestions about how to improve it by analyzing the Guaranty Law and the Real Right Law just pasted .更多还原