【作者】 虞红新；

【导师】 关继华；

【作者基本信息】 新疆医科大学 ， 中西医结合， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 目的:探讨不稳定型心绞痛患者危险分层和冠状动脉病变、中医证型的关系,分析能否通过不稳定型心绞痛危险分层预测患者的冠状动脉病变程度,验证不同中医证型患者在危险分层中分布的差异,并进一步验证各证型组患者冠状动脉病变存在的客观差异,为确定中医的危险证型提供客观依据。方法:将145例不稳定心绞痛患者分为低危、中危、高危三组及心血瘀阻、痰浊壅塞、阴寒凝滞、心肾阴虚、气阴两虚、阳气虚衰六个证型组,并行冠状动脉造影检查,以冠状动脉病变Gensini法评分,对比分析危险分层、冠状动脉Gensini积分、病变支数、中医证型的关系。结果:高危、中危、低危组间患者冠状动脉Gensini积分、病变支数差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),病变积分由高危组向低危组递减,低危组与高危组、中危组与高危组病变支数差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),三组间冠状动脉病变部位差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);各证型组间患者不稳定型心绞痛危险分层、冠状动脉病变Gensini积分的差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。痰浊壅塞型在高危组分布较多,并且其冠状动脉Gensini积分及三支病变比例最高,冠状动脉病变最为严重,初步判定痰浊壅塞型危险程度高于其他证型组;实证组与虚证组间冠状动脉病变积分,病变支数差异也有统计学意义(P＜0.05),以实证组冠状动脉病变Gensini积分相对较高(P＜0.05),而以虚症组冠状动脉病变支数相对较多(P＜0.05)。结论:不同危险分层患者间冠状动脉病变程度不同,由高危组向低危组递减;不同证型组患者在危险分层中分布不同、冠状动脉病变程度不同,痰浊壅塞型危险程度高于胸痹心痛其他证型组。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective: To study the relationship between clinical classification and angiography findings,syndrome tape of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TMC) in unstable angina pectoris. Method: 145 patients with unstable angina were divided into 3 groups according to the clinical classification standard and different TMC syndrome types, received coronary arteriography(CAG),The pathological changes among groups were compared and assessed by Gensini integral method. Results: The coronary lesion score in high risk group is higher than those two groups (P =0.000). It is shown that the unstable angina clinical classification has corellation with coronary lesion score, while There were differences in unstable angina clinical classification, Gensini score, number of coronary artery lesion between TMC syndrome groups (P<0.05). The coronary Gensini score in phlegm turbid syndrome group is higher than other groups and three artery lesion were the most in the group; Conclusions: The unstable angina clinical classification and syndrome tape of Traditional Chinese Medicine correlates with the coronary lesion degree.更多还原