【作者】 唐晓敏；

【导师】 黄明儒；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 刑法学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 在德日及我国台湾地区刑法理论界,不可罚的事前事后行为这一概念较为常见,但在我国大陆,刑法学者对之却鲜有论及,在对该概念的内涵与外延的理解上,学者们存在较大的差异,由此造成了理论上的混乱及刑事司法的不和谐,不可罚的事前事后行为的本质究竟是什么?其构成要素与表现形式有哪些?不可罚的根据与界限何在?通过立法确认该行为有无必要?有关该行为的具体法条如何设计?这些都是传统刑法理论没有涉及或没能彻底解决的问题,而要想深入挖掘该理论的法律底蕴,充分发挥其在司法实践中的机能,又都无法回避这些问题。针对上述问题,本文首先探讨了传统不可罚的事前事后行为概念的不足之处并剖析了该概念的内涵;然后对它重新进行了理论定位和结构改造,主张废弃吸收犯与牵连犯概念,将吸收关系与牵连关系作为判断不可罚的事前事后行为的标准或方法;接着从本体与形式两个方面对该行为进行了构造,将这个极其抽象、广泛的概念具体化、形象化,以增强其在刑事司法实践中的可操作性;另外还从人性、功利、经济和政策四个角度分析了不可罚的深层次缘由,揭示了不可罚的事前事后行为的偶然性和限度性,明确了不可罚与可罚的界线及其相互转化的条件;最后,为了夯实该理论的根基,促进法制统一,还对不可罚的事前事后行为立法确认的必要性进行了论证并提出了具体的设想。不可罚的事前事后行为的重新审视与定位,在理论上有助于减少纠纷,增强法的明确性;在实践上有助于更好地贯彻罪刑法定原则,维护司法公正。更多还原

【Abstract】 The conception of undeserving-punished pre-crime and after-crime offences is very common in the realms of criminal theory in Germany, Japan and the area of Taiwan, but on the mainland of China, it is seldom mentioned by scholars. There are many divergences on the comprehension of its meanings and conformations, and this leads to much disorder in criminal theories and great disharmony in criminal judicial practice. What is its nature? What are its inner compositions and outer forms? Is it necessary to confirm this conception in criminal legislation? These problems are seldom involved in traditional theories of criminal law and can’t be solved thoroughly and successfully. But when we explore its law spirits deep and make our best to utilize its functions in judicial practice, we have to face them.In order to solve these problems above, I discuss the defects of this traditional theory firstly, analyzing its meanings so that we can reconfirm its theory and reshape its conformations. It is advisable to abrogate the conceptions of absorption criminal and entanglement criminal, regarding relations of absorption and entanglement as norms or measures in the course of defining it. Then in order to increase practicable possibility in criminal judicial practice, I develop its connotations and extensions from the two aspects of its self and forms, making this most complicated and comprehensive conception more concrete and understandable. Furthermore, I discuss the deepest reasons of this conception by views of humanity, utility, economic and policy for the defects of traditional criminal law theories, explicating the boundary of‘deserving-punished’and‘undeserving-punished’and conditions by which to shift to their opposite sides, claiming that the occurrence of this conception is contingent and limitative. In the end, I regard that it is necessary to seek a position in China’s current criminal law in order to strengthen its theoretical basis, making judicial practice more harmony. I also devise several concrete articles for them by means of criminal legislation.A resurvey and redesign to the theory of undeserving-punished pre-crime and after-crime offences helps to reduce conflicts in theory and enhance clarity of criminal law, as well as carry out the principle of crime and penalty legally and safeguard equity in judicial practice.更多还原