【作者】 张秋颖；

【导师】 杨伊生；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古师范大学 ， 发展与教育心理学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 国外对社会责任心的研究兴起于20世纪50年代初,国外学者已对社会责任心的概念、结构及影响因素等问题做了一些研究,并开发出了一批社会责任心的测量工具。国内对此领域的研究还不太深入,仅停留在对社会责任心内涵的探索研究上,对于影响社会责任心的因素的研究很少见到。社会责任心是社会个体对社会公共生活中所承担责任的合理认知和评价,并体现在情感和行为之中的一种个性心理品质。公民的社会责任心水平是一个国家繁荣发展的重要保证,中学生作为未来社会的承担者和建设者,他们的社会责任心在一定程度上影响着一个国家的未来。探讨影响中学生社会责任心的因素,不仅可以丰富社会责任心理论,同时对培养中学生社会责任心具有重要的实践意义。本研究采用问卷法,选取1030名中学生,对他们进行了父母教养方式、人格、价值观和社会责任心的调查,探讨了这几者之间的关系,结论如下:1.中学生社会责任心、父母教养方式存在性别差异,女生社会责任心水平高于男生;男生父母教养方式在惩罚、严厉,过分干涉,拒绝、否认和过度保护上的得分都明显高于女生;2 .中学生父母教养方式、人格、价值观、社会责任心存在家庭来源的差异。父母教养方式方面,农村父母的积极教养方式多一些,而旗县和城市父母的消极教养方式多一些;人格方面,农村中学生的意志、耐挫折和责任好于旗县和城市的中学生;价值观方面,农村学生比旗县和城市学生更加踏实,而旗县和城市的中学生则比农村的中学生更加功利和冷漠。社会责任心方面,农村来源的中学生社会责任心水平高于旗县和城市来源的学生;3.不同职业的父母的教养方式存在显著差异,职业为农民的父母较之职业为工人、知识分子和干部的父母,积极的教养方式更多一些,父母给予子女的情感温暖和理解更多一些,而拒绝、否认和惩罚、严厉更少一些。4.父母采取情感温暖、理解的教养方式不仅可以直接提高中学生的社会责任心水平,而且可以通过对人格中内、外倾、责任和独立等人格特征的影响来提高中学生社会责任心水平;父母采取拒绝否认的教养方式则不仅直接降低中学生的社会责任心水平,而且也会对内、外倾、责任和独立等人格特征产生不利的影响,进而降低中学生的社会责任心水平。5.踏实型价值观不仅可以直接提高中学生的社会责任心水平,而且可以通过对人格中内、外倾、责任和独立等人格特征的影响来提高中学生社会责任心水平;冷漠型价值观则不仅直接降低中学生的社会责任心水平,而且也会对内、外倾、责任和独立等人格特征产生不利的影响,进而降低中学生的社会责任心水平。更多还原

【Abstract】 The foreign researches on social responsibility have sprung up in the early 1950s, foreign researchers have studied the concept, structure and influencing factors of social responsibility, and developed some measuring questionnaires of social responsibility. While domestic researches are not mature, just staying at connotation exploratory discussion in social responsibility, the researches on the influential factors of social responsibility are rarely known.Social responsibility is the reasonable cognition and evaluation of the responsibilities in the public lives for the social individuals, and it is an individuality psychological trait embodying in the sensibilities and behaviors. The level of civil social responsibility is an important guarantee for a country to develop and flourish. As the undertakers and constructors of the future society, the middle school students’social responsibility will directly affect the future of country. Therefore, the discussion of the influential factors in social responsibilities for the middle school students can not only enrich the social responsibility theory, but also have the important realistic meaning for their social responsibility education.This research used the questionnaire,and selected 1030 middle school students as the subjects, and investigated them from the aspects of parenting style, personality, value and social responsibility, and probed the relationship between social responsibility and the parenting style, the personality and the value. The conclusion as follows:1. Social responsibility and the parenting style of the middle school students have significant difference in gender. Female students are higher in social responsibility than the male students; while the male students’parenting style scores are obviously higher than the scores of female students in punishment, severity, over-interference, refusal, denial and over-protection.2. Parenting style, personality, the social responsibility and value of the middle school students have the family origin difference. In the aspect of parenting style, the parents from rural areas use more positive parenting styles, while the parents from counties and cities use more negative parenting style. In personality, the will, frustration tolerance and responsibility of the rural students are better than the ones from counties and cities. In the aspect of the value, the rural students are surer than those from counties and cities, and urban students are more realistic and indifferent. In the aspect of Social responsibility, rural students are better than the ones from counties and cities.3. The parenting styles of different vocational parents have the significant difference. Peasant parents have more positive parenting style than the intellectual parents and cadre parents, the peasant parents give their children more emotional warmth and understanding, and less refusal, denial and severity.4. Parents using emotional warmth and understanding parenting styles can help middle school students improve social responsibility, they use some personality characteristics (inner tendency, outer tendency, responsibility and independence) to improve middle school students’responsibility level. Parents who use denial parenting style have bad effects on middle school students’responsibility level, which can decrease the middle school students’responsibility level.5. The sureness value can not only improve middle school students’responsibility level but also affect personality characteristics (inner tendency, outer tendency, responsibility and independence) to improve middle school students’responsibility level. Indifferent value has bad effects on personality characteristics (inner tendency, outer tendency, responsibility and independence) and decrease middle school students’responsibility level.更多还原