【作者】 王建勋；

【导师】 艾永明；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 在民事执行过程中，由于各种主客观原因，执行机关实施强制执行时，难免会出现瑕疵执行即违法和不当执行，以致侵害执行当事人或者利害关系人的合法权益。因此，需要有完善的民事执行救济制度，为其提供救济，以全面维护执行当事人及利害关系人的合法权益。但我国民事执行救济制度立法很不完善，司法实践中存在混乱的现象，以致难以实现民事执行的程序公正和实体公正。为此，有必要研究、借鉴法制发达的国家和地区有关民事执行救济理论、立法和实践，完善我国的执行救济制度。基于此，本文就民事执行救济的一些基本理论问题进行了系统的论述和分析，通过介绍和比较分析德、法、日、我国台湾地区及瑞士等域外大陆法系民事执行救济制度，检讨我国民事执行救济制度现状，提出建构民事执行救济制度的设想：改革执行体制，建立独立的执行救济机构；建立程序上的执行救济制度；建立和完善实体上的执行救济制度包括建立债务人异议之诉、将案外人异议制度改革为第三人异议之诉等。并结合司法实践探讨了这些制度建立、完善和实施中的具体细节问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 There are some vices in the civil execution, such as illegalment and improper-execution ,when implement the enforcement due to lots of reasons. These vices trespass the legal rights of the parties or the interested. Therefore It’s important to integrity Civil execution remedy system in order to maintain the legal rights of the parties or the interested. But there are lots of deformity in Civil execution remedy system in our country, so it’s difficult to achieve justice of procedure and justice of entity. Therefore it’s important to benefit from the other countries to consummate the execution remedy system.This paper presents some basic theories of the Civil execution remedy, and check the present situation of our country by introducing and comparing the Civil execution remedy system in Germany, France, Japan, Taiwan, Switzerland and so on. This paper puts forward some recommendations: such as to reform execution system, to establish independent execution remedy institution and procedural execution remedy, to establish and consummate substantive execution remedy include debtor objection action and so on, and makes some suggestions to consummate it.更多还原