【作者】 王延红；

【导师】 范立舟；

【作者基本信息】 暨南大学 ， 历史文献学， 2007， 硕士

【副题名】立足于《宋史质》、《宋史新编》及《宋史翼》的考察

【摘要】 《宋史》是二十四史中卷帙最大、内容为最繁富的一部史著，其编撰速度之快，令人赞叹；而其对史料加工之粗，历来亦为学人所诟病。自元至清，多位学者都有对《宋史》进行改撰与补修的想法，但有的改撰成功，有的未付诸实践。改修《宋史》的潮流发轫于元末周以立，至明朝中期波澜迭起，清朝时涟漪不断，先后有二三十位学者致力于此。本文谨以明朝改撰著作中与《宋史》体例一致且断限相同的两部史著《宋史质》和《宋史新编》以及清代陆心源补修的纪传体史著《宋史翼》为中心，锥视明清宋史学。并通过三部著作与《宋史》多方面的比较，论证《宋史》在史学史上的地位不可取代。更多还原

【Abstract】 Song shi has the most volumes and the most various content in The Twenty-FourDynastic Histories. It was amazing that Song Shi was finished compiling in no morethan three years. However, the book was criticized by later scholars for its poor dataprocessing. From Yuan to Qing dynasty, several scholars tried to adapt or append newmaterials to it, and some of them succeeded. The trend of adapting SongShi originatedfrom Zhou Yili of late Yuan dynasty, which became a fashion in mid-Ming dynasty,and kept going on in Qing dynasty. During the several hundred years, there wereabout twenty scholars devoting themselves to adapting or appending new data to SongShi.Focused on three works: Song Shi Zhi, Song Shi Xin Bian, and Song Shi Yi, theauthor tried to investigate the historiography of Ming and Qing dynasty. The formertwo works were adapted from Song Shi and had the same confine and stylistic rules asit, while Song Shi Yi was appended by Lu Xinyuan of late Qing dynasty, Through thecomparison among the three works and Song Shi from various angles, expounded andproved the irreplaceable status of Song Shi in the history of historiography.更多还原