【作者】 路国正；

【导师】 张建华；

【作者基本信息】 北京工商大学 ， 民商法学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 专利侵权认定是法律实践中公认的难题,这主要是由于以下原因造成的:专利涉及技术问题和法律问题,技术是不断发展的,特别是新技术的不断出现,因而使得专利侵权认定不断面临新问题,永远不会停留在一个固定的模式上;我国实行专利制度的时间较短,积累的经验较少。随着我国经济的发展,特别是2001年加入世界贸易组织后,专利案件大幅度上升,其中绝大多数是专利侵权案件,而我国在专利侵权认定方面的规定较为原则,实践中存在较大的不确定性,所以加强这方面的研究是十分必要的。外观设计专利不同于发明和实用新型专利。发明和实用新型专利涉及的都是技术方案。外观设计专利是指对产品的形状、图案或者其结合以及色彩与形状、图案的结合所作出的富有美感并适于工业应用的新设计。可见,外观设计只跟产品的外部美感有关,不涉及产品的技术方案,鉴于此,本文只涉及发明和实用新型专利。本文主要论述发明和实用新型专利侵权认定的基本原则及不构成侵权的情况。本文分四章:第一章归纳了专利侵权行为与一般民事侵权行为的不同,以及专利制度的一些基本概念。第二章介绍了专利侵权的相同原则和等同原则,其中详细分析了等同原则,提出了我国应采纳的一些做法。主要结合我国的司法实践,以及美国、日本、欧盟的一些做法进行论述。第三章详细分析了禁止反悔原则。结合国外的一些做法以及我国目前的立法、司法现状,对禁止反悔原则适用问题进行了分析。第四章不构成专利侵权的情况或者说是专利侵权抗辩。最后总结了本人的一些浅见。一是,专利侵权责任既可能是过错责任,也可能是无过错责任,而不能是公平责任。二是,在等同原则问题上,应当采用捐献规则,以及“全部技术特征”准则。三是,禁止反悔的范围应当是“授予专利权的实质性条件”。四是,对权利用尽的范围作扩大修改,使用“专利所覆盖的产品”的措辞;在先用权问题上把“继续制造、使用”换成“继续实施”,这样才能符合设立先用权抗辩制度的初衷。本文一方面对共性、认识一致的问题进行归纳总结;另一方面对实践中遇到的一些新问题以及有争议的问题进行分析、论述、探讨,在此基础上提出一些建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 It is because of that patent involves not only legal problems but also technological problems, and the science and technology is developing continuously, so patent infringement’s judge is a generally accepted hard nut to crack and can never stay around a mode for fix up. Along with the developing of our country’s economy, especially entering into WTO in 2001 , the patent cases increases significantly, among them, the great majority are the patent infringement cases. There is no nationwide uniform judicial regulation connecting the judge of patent infringement in China.Therefore the judge of patent infringement has theoretical and practical significances."Invention" in the Patent Law means any new technical solution relating to a product, a process or improvement thereof. "Utility model" in the Patent Law means any new technical solution relating to the shape, the structure, or their combination, of a product, which is fit for practical use. "Design" in the Patent Law means any new design of the shape, pattern, color, or their combination, of a product, which creates an aesthetic feeling and is fit for industrial application. It is thus clear that,”Design”only involves the new design which creates an aesthetic feeling and is fit for industrial application, not involves the new technical solution, owing to this, this thesis only involves“Invention”and“Utility model”.This thesis mainly discuss two basic aspects which are the principles of the judge of patent infringement and the reasons of no infringement. There are four chapters in this thesis.The first chapter induces the differences between the patent infringement and the common civil tort.The second chapter involves the all covering principle-the method applied in judging the literal infringement and the doctrine of equivalent, then involves what we should do about this problem through comparing our country’s practice with the developed countries’.The third chapter involves the doctrine of prosecution history estoppels.The fourth chapter involves the refute to the patent infringement. At the end of the thesis the author deals with the summarization of the thesis. This chapter presents some advices on the progress of the patent infringement determination in China.In this thesis the author summaries the knowledge that there is no difference about patent infringement, deals with the new problems in practice, analyses and discuses the questionable things, then gives some useful proposals.更多还原