【作者】 王骏杰；

【导师】 肖中华； 邹扬；

【作者基本信息】 贵州大学 ， 法律， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 挪用资金罪中的犯罪对象“资金”，只能是货币形式，而不能是有价证券形式。否则，会导致“资金”范围失控，且违背立法者的本意；“营利活动”与“非法活动”的区分应该通过对活动中营利因素和非法因素多寡的比较来进行，而非由“行业”本身的性质来决定；挪用资金罪和挪用公款罪之间，作为犯罪对象的“资金”和“公款”并不是区分两罪的根本标准。另外，挪用资金罪是故意犯罪，挪用特定款物罪则与危害公公共安全罪中的9种过失犯罪之间存在诸多共性联系，宜被当作过失犯罪；“挪而未用”并不影响犯罪的成立和既遂；挪用资金和非法拘禁一样都属于继续犯。更多还原

【Abstract】 This article analyzes the problems with applying crime of misappropriating units’funds and makes the following clear. The object of crime of misappropriating units’funds can only can be currency instead of negotiable securities. Otherwise, the units’funds will go beyond certain confines and go against legislator’s original intention. While judging the nature of an activity, proportion of operating activities to illegal activities, rathe than the nature of industry itself works. Likewise, units’funds or public funds are not the basic standard to tell crime of misappropriating units’funds from crime of embezzlement. Crime of misappropriating units’funds is an intentional offense. Commonness relationship is evident between crime of misappropriating specfic funds and articles of the state and nine kinds of unintentional crimes of threatening public security. Therefore, crime of misappropriating specfic funds and articles of the state should be labled unintentional crime. Disposition of units’funds is considered in crime conviction instead of funds practice. Like illegal imprisonmet, crime of misappropriating units’funds is defined continued offease.更多还原