【作者】 王晓琳；

【导师】 肖伟；

【作者基本信息】 厦门大学 ， 国际法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 《中国加入世界贸易组织议定书》和《中国加入世界贸易组织工作组报告书》同为中国入世法律文件,前者第16条规定了专门针对中国一般产品的特殊保障措施,后者第242段规定了专门针对中国纺织品的特殊保障措施。“市场扰乱”是这两项特保条款的一个核心概念,其对特殊保障措施的实施有重要意义。本文主要从条约解释角度对市场扰乱进行了分析,目的在于为我国应对其他WTO成员发起的特保调查和利用WTO争端解决机制解决相应争端提供指引和参考。除去引言和结语,全文共分四章。第一章介绍了“市场扰乱”这一概念的产生与发展。通过对比可以看到,不同时期的市场扰乱的认定标准虽有所不同,但其贸易保护的目的却始终如一。第二章论述了市场扰乱的解释问题。本章首先阐明《维也纳条约法公约》的解释规则已取得《关于争端解决规则与程序的谅解书》第3条第2款所规定的“国际公法解释的习惯规则”的地位,成为WTO司法解释规则;然后,根据该解释规则确定了对市场扰乱进行解释时应主要参照的WTO协议——《保障措施协议》、《纺织品与服装协议》和《反倾销协议》;最后指出,《中国加入世界贸易组织议定书》第16条和《中国加入世界贸易组织工作组报告书》第242段中的“市场扰乱”具有一致性,应作相同理解。第三章对市场扰乱的认定标准进行了探析。本章通过借鉴《保障措施协议》、《纺织品与服装协议》及《反倾销协议》的相关规定及有关WTO案例,从进口增加、国内产业、损害、因果关系四个方面具体分析了市场扰乱的认定标准。第四章提出了我国应对这两项特保条款的态度与措施,并在具体应对措施中点明了对市场扰乱进行研究的现实意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the legal documents on the accession of China to WTO, there are two special safeguard clauses applicable only to China. One is Article 16 of Protocol on the Accession of the People’s Republic of China, which is applied to ordinary products of Chinese origin, and the other is Paragraph 242 of Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China, which is applied to textiles and apparel products of Chinese origin.“Market disruption”, a core concept of the two special safeguard clauses, is significant to the imposition of the special safeguard measures. The thesis analyzes“market disruption”mainly from the point of treaty interpretation, with the purpose to present a guide for China to cope with the special safeguard investigations instituted by the other WTO members and make our thoughts clear when utilizing the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to solve the corresponding disputes. The thesis includes four chapters besides the preface and conclusion.Chapter 1 introduces the emergence and development of the concept of market disruption. The criteria for determining whether market disruption exists vary in different periods, whereas its purpose of trade protection remains changeless.Chapter 2 expounds the preliminary issues of the interpretation of“market disruption”. First, the chapter elucidates that the interpretation rules set forth in Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, as“customary rules of interpretation of public international law”referred by DSU in Article 3.2, should be applied to the WTO disputes. Then, according to the interpretation rules set forth in Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the chapter points out the WTO agreements which should be mainly applied to the interpretation of“market disruption”, i.e. Agreement on Safeguards, Agreement on Textiles and Clothing and Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT1994. Finally, the chapter clarifies the consistency of the concept of market disruption in the two special safeguard clauses.Chapter 3 probes into the criteria for the determination of market disruption. According to the relevant provisions of Agreement on Safeguards, Agreement on Textiles and Clothing and Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT1994 and the relevant WTO cases, the chapter analyzes the criteria from four aspects, i.e. increase in imports, domestic industry, injury and causation.Chapter 4 points out our attitude and countermeasures to the two special safeguard clauses in the legal documents on the accession of China to WTO. In the countermeasures, the practical meaning of studying market disruption is further illuminated.更多还原