【作者】 林平；

【导师】 黄健雄；

【作者基本信息】 厦门大学 ， 民商法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 土地和房屋自然属性的不可分性决定了两者在法律调整上的密切联系,但两者又具有价值的可分性和法律形态的独立性。不同的协调方法导致不同的立法模式。我国房地一体原则,自产生以来一直发挥着重要的作用,但随着社会的发展,冲突亦不断凸显。本文从各个国家对土地和房屋关系的模式入手,探讨所采模式与社会背景的密切联系;在比较分析的基础上,解读我国房地一体原则的内涵;透过其存在的冲突,剖析背后的原因,以期能找到较适合中国现状的立法模式。本文除了引言和结论外,主要内容分三章:第一章从各个国家对土地和房屋关系模式入手,探讨其与社会的密切联系,并比较分析了我国房地一体原则的内涵。目前,在世界各主要国家,存在一元主义模式、二元主义模式、“地随房走”模式以及房地一体模式。不论是哪种模式,都是各个国家基于其特定社会背景而做出的选择,并随着社会的发展不断变更。第二章分析我国房地一体原则存在的冲突,并剖析其背后的原因。随着社会的发展,房地一体原则不论是在理论中抑或实践中均产生了许多冲突。这些冲突的产生,主要有以下几个原因:所有制层面上的原因;法律理论、法律规定上的不一致;房地产价值形态的可分性、巨大性;相关制度的不完善;对土地利用方式的多样化等。第三章在比较分析各个学者对我国模式选择的基础上,寻找较适合中国现状的立法模式。认为二元主义模式适应了市场经济的需求,能在较大程度上解决房地之间的矛盾,并通过对我国土地使用权法律地位和性质的探讨,分析二元主义模式在我国的实际可行性。更多还原

【Abstract】 The impartibility of land and building in nature determines the close relationship on legal adjustment, but they two have separability in value and independency in law. One management can form one legislation pattern. The principle of integration between house ownership and land-using right (Integrative Pattern) in China plays an important role since it came into being, but along the development of society, more and more conflicts appear. This dissertation starts from the patterns of land and building in head countries, discusses the close relationship between the choice of legislation pattern and the social background; compares the legislation pattern between China and other head countries, explains the connotation of our Integrative Pattern; analyzes the reasons of the conflicts, hopes to search a pattern that is more proper for current society.The main content is divided into there chapters, excluding the preface and the conclusion:Chapter One analyzes the relationship between land and building. Starting from the patterns of relationship between land and building in head countries, this chapter discusses the close relationship between the pattern and society, explains the connotation of Integrative Pattern from the perspective of comparative jurisprudence. At present, there are mainly four patterns in head countries, which are Monistic Pattern, Dualistic Pattern, Pattern of Building in Dominant, Integrative Pattern. Each country makes its selection of pattern based upon the given social background, and also does some adjustments along the development of society.Chapter Two analyzes the conflicts and the reasons of Integrative Pattern. Alone the development, Integrative Pattern caused many conflicts both in theory and in practice. The reasons are mainly: ownership system, variance of statutory, separability and largeness of land and building in value, defect on relative system, diversity on utilization of land.Chapter Three analyzes how to solve the conflict of Integrative Pattern. On the basis of comparative analysis of sholars’viewpoints of the pattern selection, the author holds that the Dualistic Pattern may fit the needs of market economy, solve the contradiction between land and building, then analyzes the real feasibility of theDualistic Pattern in China after discussing the role in law and nature of land-using right.更多还原