【作者】 肖贤玉；

【导师】 张立荣；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 行政管理， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 近些年来,随着法治建设和高校改革进程的深入,大学生、高校教师与高等学校之间的纠纷事件越来越多,司法审查介入高校权力运行的问题就越来越频繁地被提及。在当前依法治国的背景下,大学生和高校教师的法律意识显著提高,如何通过司法审查制度,审查高校权力运行的合法性,监督高校权力的运行,纠正违法的高校权力行使,实现权力对权力的制约,保护公民、法人和其他组织的合法权益,同时又高度尊重高校的学术自由和独立性,实现大学理想,无论在理论上还是司法实践上都是一个重要的问题。但司法审查介入高校权力运行,目前还面临着很多困境。我国高校的独立性先天不足,学术权力的行使对行政权力依附性较高。而且,我国高校的主体性质界定含糊不清,公共行政职能和事业单位功能同构,尊重高校学术自由与实现司法审查制度之间存在矛盾。因此,要深入辨析高校权力的性质、结构和运行机制,深入探讨和分析高校权力运行的司法审查的必要性、可行性以及实现机制。本文共分四个部分。绪论部分,包括写作的缘起,若干重要概念的界定和阐释,国内外研究现状述评,本文的研究方法、结构和创新意图。第一部分论述我国高校权力运行司法审查的必要性,先从来自武汉理工大学的一个典型案例谈起,归纳总结了我国高校权力运行中的部分纷争现象。第二部分论述我国高校权力运行司法审查面临的困境,包括高校法律性质界定的模糊、高校事业单位功能与公共行政职能的同构、尊重高校学术自由与发挥司法审查功能的矛盾。第三部分阐述了我国高校权力运行司法审查的实现机制,包括我国高校权力运行司法审查的可行性,确定高校行政主体的法律地位,高校权力运行司法审查的原则和高校权力运行司法审查的“合理域”本文的研究方法以实证分析和规范分析两种研究方法相结合。本文可能的创新点是:一是探讨了司法审查介入我国高校权力运行面临的困境;二是初步探讨了司法审查介入我国高校权力运行的实现机制,特别探讨了司法审查介入高校权力运行的“合理域”及“合理域”之外的学术自律机制。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the passing few years, coupled with the advancement of law construction theuniversity reforms, disputes between the university student, the university teachers andthe college turned up more frequently , so did discussion of the judicial examinationinvolvement in the university authority. Under the big background of legally ruling thenation, the university student’s and the university teacher’s law consciousness remarkablyenhanced. How to utilize the judicial examination system, to examine the validity ofuniversity authority, to supervise university authority operation, to correct illegal exerciseof university power, and to realize restriction from authority to authority so as to protectlegitimate rights and interests of the citizen, the legal person and other organizations’while keeping the academic freedom and the independence of the university at the sametime, is a question theoretically meaningful and judicially important.But there are many difficulties existing in the judicial examination against universityauthority at present. The independence of our university is congenitally deficient, theacademic authority is adhered to the administrative authority. Moreover, our university ishard to be clearly defined as main body in the law, with the public administrationfunction and the institution function mutually functioned, so the respecting universityacademic freedom contradicted the realization judicature examination system. Therefore,we must thoroughly discriminate the university authority the nature, the structure and theoperational mechanism, thorough discussing the necessity, feasibility as well asrealization mechanism of the judicial involvement in university authority.This article altogether is divided into four parts. The introduction, includes thewriting origin, certain important concepts explanations, the research situation of domesticand foreign countries, research technique applied, writing structure and innovationintention. Taking a typical case from Wuhan University of Technology, the first partelaborates necessity of judicial examination against our university authority, listed theillegal power abuse phenomenon existing in our universities. The second part analyzedthe difficulties in judicial examination against our university power. The third partdescribed the practical operational mechanism of judicial examination against ouruniversity authority, including feasibility of judicial examination against our universityauthority, the definition of university’s main body legal status, the principles and"reasonable territory" of judicial involvement in university authority movement.This article unified the standard analysis and case analysis in the research technique.This article has the innovative points as follow: first, it clarified the dilemma of judicialexamination involvement in the university authority;second, discussed the practicaloperational mechanism of our university authority, especially "the reasonable territory"of judicial involvement and academic autonomy mechanism beyond the "the reasonableterritory".更多还原