【作者】 刘爱斌；

【导师】 张礼洪；

【作者基本信息】 华东政法学院 ， 法律， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 社会的任何进步和新事物的出现,随之而来的就是法律问题。互联网的出现对各国的法律制度都提出了严峻的挑战。在网络发展的过程中,不可避免地出现了许多问题,对这些纠纷地处理,既有待于新的法律,也有待于正确适用现行的法律、法规。目前,网络上矛盾最突出的也是暴露最多的莫过于著作权的保护问题,这与互联网是一种信息的载体有关。网络上著作权侵权纠纷以及相应的法律救济是著作权保护制度向网络空间延伸过程中各种矛盾的综合反映,它构成了当代著作权保护中最新奇也最精彩的部分,同时也引发了网络上著作权保护的深入的思考。本文从侵权行为的一般理论出发,着重论述了网络环境下版权侵权的归责原则及构成要件。并认为网络环境下版权侵权行为的归责原则应以过错责任原则(包括过错推定原则)为一般原则,无过错责任原则为补充,并且需要法律的明确规定。对版权侵权民事责任的构成要件,本人认为不宜采用传统侵权法的理论,而应当有所突破。传统侵权法理所说的构成要件实际上是作为债权保护方法的损害赔偿责任的构成要件,而并不是作为抽象的民事责任的构成要件。对版权侵权民事责任的构成要件的讨论不应当是笼统的,而应当针对停止侵害、消除危险、赔偿损失、赔礼道歉、消除影响等分别进行讨论。本文还分别就网络内容提供者的版权侵权责任及归责原则,网络服务提供者的版权侵权责任及归责原则,网络用户的版权侵权责任及归责原则做了详细的研究。对几种间接侵权责任,如帮助侵权责任、代位侵权责任、诱导侵权责任做了简单的介绍,并提出我国的著作权法中应该增加相关的规定,以更好的应对网络环境下的版权侵权。最后对版权侵权的例外——合理适用如何在网络环境下适用做了探讨。本人认为传统合理使用制度在网络环境下依然适用,至于传统合理使用的范围在网络环境下是应该扩大还是缩小,或者不变,这就要结合数字技术的特点综合考虑各方面因素来确定。结合我国的国情笔者提出应该在保留传统合理使用范围的基础上,适当增加合理使用的范围。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the arising of any newborn affair and improvement of our society, follow by legal problems. The emerging of the Internet brings tough challenges to laws of every country. Many problems emerge unavoidable in the development of the net. How to settle these disputes depends on not only the new legislation but also the appropriate of laws and regulations currently in force. By now, the most serous and distinct problem of the net is about the protection of the copyrights. This has something to do with the net being a vehicle of information. The dispute of the infringement of copy rights in the net and the corresponding legal remedy is the comprehensive reflection of protection systems of copy rights transmitting to the net, which build the most interesting and novelist part of contemporary protection of copy rights, with the deep thinking of the protection of copy rights in the net.All violations from the general theoretical perspective, focused on the network environment of copyright infringement attribution principles and constituent elements. I think the network environment of copyright violations attribution principles should fault liability principle (including the principle of presumption of fault) for the general principle of no-fault liability principles as a complement, and the need to clear the legal provisions. The constituent elements of civil liability for copyright infringement, I think it appropriate to introduce the traditional tort law theories, but should breakthroughs. Traditional tort law has said the constituent elements as creditor protection methods actually damage liability constituent elements, not as abstract elements constitute civil liability. The constituent elements of civil liability for copyright infringement the discussion should not be generalized, but should stop targeting against, the elimination of risk, damages and destruction, the elimination of separately discussed. The network also separately on the content provider copyright infringement liability and attribution principles, the network service providers and copyright infringement liability attribution principles network users and copyright infringement liability attribution principles detailed study. To which several new types of indirect infringement liability, such as contributory infringement liability, vicarious liability, induced infringement on the responsibility of doing a simple, and to make our copyright laws should be increased provisions related to the network environment for better copyright infringement. Finally -- reasonable exceptions to copyright infringement apply to the application made in the network environment to explore. Rational use of the traditional system is still applied in the network environment, the rational use of the traditional system in the network environment should be expanded or reduced, or unchanged, and this combination of digital technology will be integrated into the feature various factors to determine. In light of China’s national conditions I propose we should retain the traditional use of reasonable basis to appropriately increase the rational use of the area.更多还原