【作者】 庄慧鑫；

【导师】 孙昌军； 余松龄；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 刑法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 酌定量刑情节是刑法予以概括性规定的，体现行为的社会危害性和行为人的人身危险性，在刑罚裁量时酌情适用的各种事实情况。本文在对刑法学界现有的酌定量刑情节概念进行辨析的基础上，认为应从下定义的逻辑方法和酌定情节的法定性两个角度出发，破除传统概念的误区，真正揭示其本质属性，主张以“确定量刑情节”替代“法定量刑情节”来作为酌定量刑情节的对称，在明确概念前提下，本文对酌定量刑情节的基本范畴作了进一步阐述。 笔者认为，酌定量刑情节的地位有待提高，而并非停留在“法定情节的必要补充”。法定性决定了司法者在刑罚裁量时应当对某酌定量刑情节的考虑和认定，从而对量刑产生和对独立的影响，内容的概括性决定了酌定量刑情节的功能是非恒定的，从宽从严抑或中性的具体情况只能在个案中得以表现，这就要法官审慎适度地行使自由裁量权，作到罪刑均衡。 本文对酌定量刑情节并非采用传统的简要列举方式为界定其外延，而是先以多种标准划分类别，再从宏观考察的角度，对中外各国立法体例进行借鉴，然后针对其主要表现形式进行了阐述和探讨，另外与相关概念进了比较对于我国大陆新旧刑法典，对于酌定量刑情节的立法规定，本文分析了刑法典修改变更之处，讨论了现行立法的缺陷不足，并从立法与司法两个方向提出了完善建议，最后，本文就公认的几种酌定量刑情节如犯罪动机、犯罪手段与方式、犯罪的时空环境、犯罪结果分别予以论证，至于争议较多的社会形势、刑事政策和民愤等因素也进行了辨别取舍。在司法适用方面，本文以宽严不同，分别对酌定减轻情节、酌定免除处罚、酌定从重、从轻情节的适用作了较为切实可行的阐释，以利于司法实践。更多还原

【Abstract】 The discretionary circumstances of sentencing is some kinds of facts broadly by ?the criminal law, which embodying the social harm of activity and the personal fatalness of the actor and being applied in the course of sentencing. On the basis of analysis of the concepts in the criminal law fields nowadays, this thesis considers that, at the starting of logical method of definition and legality of the discretionary circumstances of sentencing, we should beak the mistake of traditional concepts and disclose the essential attribution. The legal circumstances of sentencing should be replaced by the determinative circumstances of sentencing, which is correlative to the discretionary circumstances of sentencing.With a definite concept as a precondition, this thesis deals with some basic predicaments of the discretionary circumstances and view that its status should not be "the supplement of the legal circumstances of sentencing", but should be raised. Legality determined that the discretionary circumstances should be considered and affirmed by judgers when sentencing and produces some detached effects generalization of content determined that their function is not constant, but exhibiting in the specific cases條ighter, heavier or neutral, which need judgers to exert the power of mobile sentencing rigidly for the suiting punishment to crime.The thesis doesn’t briefly enumerate to definite the range of the discretionary circumstances of sentencing in the traditional means, but district the styles in different standards in the general view, refer to the legal systems of many countries in the world, argue and research some major modes and compare the discretionary circumstances of sentencing with some concerned concepts. About the rule about the discretionary circumstances of sentencing in our old and new criminal codes, these articles analyzes the conversion, argues the defects of actual legislation and introduces some suggestion about legislation and judicatory. At last, this article treats of some discretionary circumstances of sentencing such as criminal motive, criminal approach and pattern, criminal space time and criminal consequent. In additional, the thesis distinct and comport some factors such as social situation, criminal policy and social consensus, which are argued violently. About judicial application, the thesis explicates the discretionary reducing, remission, heavier and lighter circumstances of sentencing to divert the judicial practicing更多还原