电针与毫针治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床研究

【作者】 范鸿；

【导师】 徐恒泽；

【作者基本信息】 南京中医药大学 ， 针灸学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 本课题将腰椎间盘突出症患者分为电针治疗组与毫针治疗组，治疗一个疗程(10次)，以患者疼痛程度积分(vas)、及腰腿功能、ADL积分为观察指标，分别在治疗前、治疗5次和治疗后进行评分。目的是观察不同针刺方法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效，以选择最佳治疗方法，提高疗效。 临床结果显示：电针组与毫针组治疗后自身前后对照，疼痛程度及腰腿功能、ADL积分均获得明显改善，经统计学处理有显著性差异，但两组之间比较无统计学差异。治疗5次后，电针组在疼痛程度改善方面明显优于毫针组，具有统计学差异。 本课题研究结果表明，电针与毫针治疗腰椎间盘突出症具有肯定的临床疗效，因此都可以作为治疗腰椎间盘突出症的一种保守治疗方法。但在针刺镇痛方面，电针组具有见效快、镇痛作用强的特点，因此，缓解腰椎间盘突出症的疼痛症状，最好选择电针治疗。更多还原

【Abstract】 In this paper ,patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion (LIDP) are divided into two groups, and accept pure acupuncture treatment and electric acupuncture treatment respectively for lOdays. Observe VAS , waist leg function, the integral calculus of ADL , and compare the points before curing with that after 5 times curing and after 10 times curing .The purpose is to observe the effect of LIDP with different pinprick methods, and then we can choose the best way to improve the effect.Clinical result manifestates the VAS , waist leg function, the integral calculus of ADL of both groups are improved , and shows obvious covariance after treatment . But those signs after treatment between two groups haven’t show the covariance .After 5 times curing , the impovement of the pain degree in electic acupuncture group is more obvious than that in pure acupuncture , and have the covariance stasticly.This result of the lesson shows that both pure acupuncture and electric acupuncture have affirmative curative effect, thereforing can be used as a conservative treatment to cure the LIDP . But as far as alleviating pain concerns, electric acupuncture is characterized as taking effect quickly, alleviating pain effectively. Therefore, to alleviat the symptom of pain of LIDP , best choice is electric acupuncture.更多还原