【作者】 武从斌；

【导师】 蔡守秋；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 环境法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 环境民事侵权行为是一种特殊的侵权行为，由此引起的诉讼存在着举证困难和举证责任分配的难题，对这个领域进行研究对改变目前我国环境民事侵权诉讼的混乱状况有重要意义。本文以考察实现实体法价值的程序法方法为线索，结合国内外理论研究成果和环境与民事立法的价值取向，主要阐述了环境民事侵权诉讼举证责任倒置的概念及性质，真伪不明状态出现的条件及避免在此状态下判决的对策，以及举证责任倒置时提供证据责任的承担及证明效果等问题，并尝试就环境民事侵权诉讼理论与实践的发展与完善提出拙见，希望对我国环境民事诉讼实践有所贡献。 本文第一章介绍了环境民事侵权行为的特殊性及由此引起的问题；在第二章结合英美法系及大陆法系举证责任分配理论，阐述了举证责任的性质；第三章阐述国内外环境民事诉讼举证责任分配理论与实践；第四章着重阐述举证责任倒置理论；最后在第五章作出总结，提出建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 Environmental tort is a special behavior,which brings about the complexity of the burden of proof,therefor,the study in this area is of vital importance in clarifying the chaos in the action of environmental tort.This paper endeavors to expound the concept and nature of the shifting of the burden of proof,the conditions of non liguet and the approach to avoid the judgement on this occasion along with the responsibility of presenting evidence and effects of proving in the case of environmental tort in such a way as to realize the value of substantial law. The arguments are based on the theory in distribution of burden of proof at home and abroad as well as on the value orientation of lawmaking in this area. meanwhile,the paper serves to make some suggestions on development and improvement of the theory and practice in the area,which will,I hope,contribute to the practice of the action.Chapter One mainly introduces the peculiarity of environmental tort and the emerging problem in the kind of action;Chapter Two deals with the nature of burden of proof in the light of theories in Common law and Continental law;Chapter Three presents the theory and practice in distribution of burden of proof in environmental tort action;Chapter Four mainly deals with the theory of burden of proof; At last comes the conclusion and suggestion in Chapter Five.更多还原