【作者】 肖茜；

【导师】 谢贵安；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 专门史， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 本文分为上下两篇。上篇以查嗣庭案为中心。查嗣庭“维民所止”之题并不存在，但查嗣庭因此题获罪的说法却广为流传。文章通过清人笔记、野史及官方史书的记载，弄清了“维民所止”说的由来，及查嗣庭案本身的原由。指出这一误传是特定的历史环境与普遍的历史误读两方面的原因造成。 下篇以乾隆朝的下层士人自动献策这一特殊的文字狱案为重点。文章分析因为受到官方的人才政策和科举困难所驱使，他们为了获得统治者的赏识而自动进献书策，然而由于民间秘密组织的存在，乾隆必定会加重对他们的处罚。文章认为因为君主专制和忠君思想的存在，下层士人自动献策案在清朝产生的影响是有限的。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the first part, article debate the case of Zha Si-ting. In the case of Zha Si-ting, the test question of Weimin Suozhi spreaded widely, but in fact this test question didn’t exist at all. The article retrospect the historical materials of private notes and archives, which recorded the case of Zha Si-ting in detail of in brief. The article thinks out that the special historical environment and the common historical misinterpretation cause the misinformation.In the second part, there were an special kind of literary inquisitions in the Qianlong regime that lower intellectual sent their books and constructions to the officials who intended to get into the official system. The article think that the reason of their action is that they were input by the policy of the emperor and difficulty of examination system, but for the secret society, the Emperor Qianlong punished them tight. The article dictate because of the Monarch dominationism and the feudal monarch thought, the special kind of literary inquisitions had no influence in the Qing Dynasty.更多还原