【作者】 叶小琴；

【导师】 莫洪宪；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 刑法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 刑法发展史是一部罪刑关系变迁史，实现罪刑关系的核心就在于刑事司法，其中量刑问题是刑法理论的缩图，而量刑的公正程度就取决于对量刑情节的认定和适用。本文初步探讨了量刑情节的基本理论问题，全文除引言外，共分为三章。 引言，以促进量刑公正为契机提出了量刑情节的研究这一课题，同时在简要分析量刑情节的适用现实和研究现状的基础上，揭示了量刑情节研究的实践和理论意义。 第一章量刑情节的界定，从情节的一般界定出发，从内涵，外延和属性三个方面界定了量刑情节，认为量刑情节是体现行为的社会危害性程度或被告人的人身危险性状况，并进而决定被告人承担刑事责任的方式及程度的具体情况，兼具外延的广泛性、内容的非基本性、功能的全面性和作用的独立性四个特征。同时，进一步分析了量刑情节与犯罪情节、非罪情节、定罪情节和行刑情节之间的关系，并在外延界定上将量刑情节作了基本分类和附属分类的划分。 第二章量刑情节的适用，首先从禁止重复评价、具体评价和整体评价三个方面探讨了适用量刑情节的基本原则。然后分别从单个量刑情节、数个量刑情节并存这两方面讨论了量刑情节的具体适用，认为在数个逆向量刑情节并存时应该采用抵销法解决量刑情节的冲突。 第三章量刑情节的发展完善，在从澄清“情节”的身份、充实量刑情节的内容两方面提出立法完善建议的同时，大力提倡量刑情节的司法完善，并从发布规范的司法解释，建立有效的量刑指导体系，在判决书中阐明适用量刑情节的理由，以及上诉审加大对量刑的审判监督力度四个角度阐明了量刑情节的司法完善方案。更多还原

【Abstract】 The history of the development of criminal law is a history of the change of the relation between crime and punishment, and the core of the realization of the relation depends on criminal justice, therein the problem of sentencing is the miniature of criminal theory, and the degree of fair sentencing lies on the cognizance and application to the circumstances of sentencing. The paper does a simple study on the basic theory of circumstances of sentencing, and it can be divided into three parts besides the introduction.Introduction, brings forward the problem of the study on circumstances of sentencing on the basis of promoting fair sentencing, and basing on a brief analysis of the current application and research about circumstances of sentencing, theoretic significance and practice value of study on circumstances of sentencing are revealed.The chapter I of the definition of circumstances of sentencing, starting from the general definition of circumstances, defines the circumstances of sentencing from the angles of meanings, range and characteristic. The chapter brings forwards, the circumstances of sentencing is the concrete conditions that reflect the degree of harm done to society of the action or the situations of the dangerousness of the defendant and therefore decide the way and degree of criminal responsibility which the defendant bears, and have four characteristics of the universality of range, the comprehensiveness of function, the non-fundamentality of content and the independence of effect. Moreover, the chapter analyzes the relation of circumstances of sentencing between circumstances of the crime, circumstances of the non-crime, circumstances for adjudgment, circumstances in the execution of punishment, and divides circumstances of sentencing into basic classification and affiliated classification from the angle of definition of range.The chapter II of the application of the circumstances of sentencing, discuss theprinciples of the application of circumstances of sentencing firstly from three angles of prohibition of double evaluation, concrete evaluation and overall evaluation. Then, it discusses the concrete application of circumstances of sentencing from two angles of single circumstances of sentencing and couple circumstances of sentencing, and thinks that the method of setoff should be applied to resolve the conflict of circumstances of sentencing when there are couple converse circumstances of sentencing at the same time.The chapter III of the perfection of the circumstances of sentencing, brings forward the suggestion of legislative perfection from two angles of clarifying the identity of circumstances of sentencing and enriching the content of circumstances of sentencing at first, and advocates judicial perfection very much. Then it illustrates the project of judicial perfection from four aspects: announce normative judicial interpretation, establish effective system of sentencing guidance, illustrate the reason of the application of circumstances of sentencing in judgment, and strengthen trial supervision in second instance.更多还原