【作者】 郝力；

【导师】 丁文英；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 民商法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 对知识产权权利人、侵权人及法官而言，知识产权侵权损害赔偿问题是个至为重要的问题，值得从理论上进行深入研究。首先对权利人而言，其诉讼的根本目的通常并非仅仅是请求法院认定侵权人的行为构成侵权，而是要对侵权人进行制裁，并使自身获得充分的司法救济。权利人在诉讼中会算一笔经济帐，权衡通过诉讼来制裁侵权、保护知识产权利益是否“合算”，会不会在经济上得不偿失。其次，对侵权人而言，一旦被起诉将面临什么样的法律后果是其非常关心的问题。如果对其制裁力度不够，侵权所得利益高于因制裁而遭受的损失，将“激励”侵权人继续其侵权行为；反之，其将接受侵权受到的“教训”，从而“痛改前非”。最后对法官而言，在裁决中要考虑当事人之间的利益平衡，甚至案件当事人与社会公众之间的利益平衡问题。一方面法官对侵权人的制裁应足以挽回权利人的损失，使其得到相应的补偿，同时也要使侵权人感受“切肤之痛”，从而对社会公众起到警示作用；另一方面制裁也不是无限制的，法官应根据侵权情节、社会经济的实际状况，考虑救济的合理性，以顾及侵权人的权益乃至于社会公共利益。因此，面对我国“入世”后的新形势，当知识产权对国家经济发展起到越来越重要的作用，世界各国都不断提高知识产权保护水平之际，结合国内外的情况和法律对知识产权侵权损害赔偿问题进行系统研究具有重要意义。本文从知识产权侵权损害赔偿的含义，知识产权侵权损害赔偿与一般民事侵权损害赔偿的比较，知识产权侵权损害赔偿的范围，如财产的实际损失、精神、商誉损害、权利人为调查和制止侵权所支付的合理费用(包括律师费)及判决前的利息应否列入赔偿范围，知识产权侵权损害赔偿的原则，知识产权侵权损害赔偿的性质，知识产权侵权损害赔偿的计算方法，如权利人的实际损失、侵权人的非法获利、在确定法定赔偿数额时应考虑的因素以及我国现行知识产权法侵权损害赔偿制度存在的不足及完善建议等几个方面，粗浅探索了国内知识产权法解决司法实践中知识产权侵权损害赔偿的合理、合法并可具体操作的途径。更多还原

【Abstract】 Damages for infringement of intellectual property is the most important issue to the obligee of intellectual property, the infringement and the judge as well. It is an issue worthy of further theoretical study. First, the real purpose of the obligee’s lawsuit is not only to realize the motion for a ruling that the acts of the infringement constitute the infringement, but also to punish the infringement and make himself get sufficient judicial remedy. The obligee would do his accounts and make sure whether it is worthwhile to punish the infringement and protect his interests of intellectual property by means of lawsuits. Second, to the infringement, he is concerned about what kind of legal consequences he has to face caused by the lawsuit. If the punishment is inadequate and the profits for infringement are higher than the loss due to the punishment, the obligee would be stimulated to continue his acts of infringement, whereas those who are punished for the acts of infringement would thoroughly rectify his errors. Finally, to the judge, he should consider the balance of interests of the parties concerned, even the balance of interests between the parties concerned and the public. On one hand, the judge should punish the infringement to compensate the loss of the obligee and make sure his corresponding compensation while make the infringement experience "the keenly felt pain" so as to warn the whole society; On the other hand, the punishment is not unlimited. The judge should consider the rational remedies to realize the interests of the obligee and that of the whole society according to the seriousness of the infringement and the practical situation of the social economy.With China’s entry to WTO, the intellectual property is becoming more and more important to our economy. Nowadays, all countries in the world are increasingly improving the protection of intellectual property. Therefore, combined with the situations and laws of different countries, it is significant to make systematic research into the damages for infringement of intellectual property . In this thesis, the author introduces the implication of the damages for infringement of intellectual property, compares the damages for infringement of intellectual property and the that of the general damages for civil infringement, the scope of the damages for infringement of intellectual property, such as the actual loss, mental damages and damages of commercial honor, the reasonable expenditure for the oblige to investigate and stop the infringement (including the lawyer’s fee) and the interests prior to the judgment should be listed in the scope of compensation or not, the principles and nature of damages for infringement of intellectual property, the ways to calculate the damages for infringement of intellectual property, such as the actual loss of the oblige, the illegal profits of the infringement, the factors that should be considered in defining the amount of compensation and the deficiencies and improvement of the current system of damages for infringement of intellectual property in China. Based on these introductions, the author makes research into the rational, legitimate and practical solutions for the Intellectual Property Law to solve the problems in damages for infringement of intellectual property in judicial practice.更多还原