【作者】 刘婕；

【导师】 罗成琰；

【作者基本信息】 湖南师范大学 ， 中国现当代文学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 作为保守的学术派别出现在中国新文学史上的学衡派，在很长一段时间内受到了冷落和批判，它与新文化派的论争也以失败而告终。但是在新时期的文化开放的氛围下，学衡派又受到了相当一批学者的重视。那么，在当年新文化运动蓬勃发展的情势中，学衡派为什么选择了维护传统文化的承继，它的选择有怎样的历史依据、造成了怎样的学术意义，以及我们站在当前的学术角度如何重新审视这个学派的现代价值，这是本文所要论述的几个内容。 学衡派对传统文化尤其是儒家文化有着血脉相连的心理依赖性，他们中的许多人都是抱着复兴本土文化的夙愿而学习西方文化的，为的是找到一条使中西文化互相交流对话的可能通道。幸运的是，他们找到了“新人文主义”，从而将传统文化的发展纳入世界保守主义的潮流之内。从这个意义上来说，学衡派的选择是有其历史的必然性的。 学衡派在中国的新文化背景下是作为主流话语的边缘学派而存在的。它对主流学术运动起到了一定的制衡和纠偏的作用，在一定程度上弥补了新文化派的学术缺失，纠正了其极端的价值判断。它所提倡的在稳健、平和的态度下调和中西文化的构想，在某种程度上有其合理的意义。 在传统回归热兴起之后，学衡派所代表的独立的学术精神、精英分子的知识理性和对人文精神的重视，都促使他们的学术观点在现代化的商品潮流冲击下重新焕发出力量，而他们作为保守主义者所产生的现代意义也需要人们重新加以评价。更多还原

【Abstract】 As a conservative school of thought in China’s new literature history, Critical Review school was subject to cold shoulder and criticism for a long period, meanwhile its debate with Neoculture School ended in failure. But in the atmosphere of opening culture in the new period, Critical Review school draws a number of scholars’ attention again.Then, some contents to be discussed in this thesis are the questions why Critical Review school chose to maintain the traditional culture as the then New Culture Movement was flourishing, what was its historical gist and what learning meaning did it make and how we resurvey this school of thought starting from present learning angles.Psychologically, Critical Review school has blood relationship with Chinese traditional culture, especially the Confucian culture. Bearing in their mind the long-cherished wish of the revitalization of the local culture, many scholars of this school studied western culture so as to find out a possible path for conversation between Chinese and western cultures. Fortunately, they found Neohumanism, which brought the development of the traditional culture into the trend of conservatism worldwide. In this sense, Critical Review school’s choice had its own inevitability.Critical Review school existed as a marginal school of thought of the mainstream discourse during Chinese New Culture Movement, which counterbalanced and rectified deviations of the mainstream learning movement to some degree, made up for the learning omissions of the Neoculture School and corrected its extreme value judgment to some degree.Its proposition to conciliate Chinese and western cultures with a prudent and mild attitude is somewhat reasonable.When the tradition regression current is on the rise nowadays, the independent learning spirit, elites’ knowledge rationality and stress on humanistic spirit represented by Critical Review school make this school’s learning viewpoints regain their vigour against the impact of the modern commodity currents. Furthermore, the modern significance of this school’s scholars as conservatists needs to be reevaluated.更多还原