节点文献

吻合器痔上粘膜环切术与传统外剥内扎术的临床对比研究

Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoid Versus Milligan-Morgan Operation

【作者】 殷红专

【导师】 苏琪;

【作者基本信息】 中国医科大学 , 外科学, 2004, 硕士

【摘要】 目的 探讨吻合器痔上粘膜环切术(procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids,PPH)的适应证、方法、临床应用价值及与传统Milligan-Morgan(外剥内扎)术比较有何种优点。 方法 总结30例PPH手术(Ⅰ组)和30例Milligan-Morgan手术(Ⅱ组),分别对其手术时间、术后疼痛指数、住院时间、并发症及住院费用等进行对比研究。 结果 Ⅰ组手术时间、术后疼痛指数、住院时间明显少于Ⅱ组,Ⅰ组住院费用高于Ⅱ组,早期轻度大便失禁等的并发症发生率Ⅰ组明显少于Ⅱ组。 结论 PPH治疗Ⅲ°—Ⅳ°痔的近期疗效优于Milligan-Morgan手术,且具有安全、有效、手术时间短、住院时间少、恢复快等优点。

【Abstract】 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoid (PPH) in the treatment of patients with severe hemorrhoids (grade III IV), whether to take advantage of Milligan-Morgan operation.Methods: 30 cases(group I) of hemorrhoids at the third or fourth degree were operated by PPH and other 30 cases(group II) by Milligan-Morgan. Compare the operating time, hospitalization time, complications and the cost of these two groups.Results: Except for the cost , the group PPH is much better than the Milligan -Morgan group in terms of operating time, pain index, length of hospital stay. For complications, the incidence of occurrence of anal discharge in group I is much lower than that of group II.Conclusion: PPH is a safe and effective procedure for III, IV hemorrhoids and its shorter term outcome is better than Milligan- Morgan procedure.

【关键词】 PPHMilligan-Morgan 术
【Key words】 HemorrhoidPPHMilligan-Morgan operation
  • 【分类号】R657.1
  • 【下载频次】142
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络