【作者】 陈健；

【导师】 罗卿平；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 建筑设计及理论， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 近年来，全国上下掀起一股建设新校园的热潮。新校园教学楼组群的设计，融合了时代的诸多需求，多采用“集合式”的组织方式，与传统老校园中“分散式”有着明显的差别。将两种不同的教学楼组群模式进行比较研究，并集合国内具体的校园实例，特别是目前新建高校中的诸多“集合式”组群实例，有助于对高校教学楼组群更加深入地认识和了解，以期能对日后校园更好的建设和完善有着一定的促进作用。 文章分成四个章节，主要围绕两个问题展开论述。第一章主要阐述国内高校教学楼组群的两种典型模式及其成因分析。第二、三、四章节分别从功能设置、空间组织、建筑形态三个方面对两种典型模式进行比较。在后三章中，又主要从“差异”和“完善”两个层面展开论述。“差异”主要是比较两种模式的差别，阐述各自设计中的一些不足；而“完善”主要是在“差异”的基础上针对具体不足提出一些改善的措施和方法，为日后更好的教学楼组群设计提供一些新思路、新方法。更多还原

【Abstract】 Recently, there stands an upsurge to construct new campuses all over the country. New period requires new organization of teaching building in new campuses. New teaching building groups were mostly in ’complex style’, which is quite different from the ’disperse style’ of ones. In this thesis the two different group styles are studied, combining specific examples in domestic campus, especially examples of complex construction in new campus. It will be very helpful for the further understanding to teaching building group, and for the better designs and constructions in university campuses.Four chapters compose the thesis and two main topics are discussed. Chapter 1 demonstrates the two typical models of teaching building group and discuss the reasons. Other 3 chapters compare the two models within function setup, space organization and form presentation. The discussion is carried out in two levels--’difference’ and ’consummation’. By comparing the differences of two models and demonstrating the disfigurements of campus designs, ’difference’ is described. And ’consummation’ is demonstrated by providing some methods, which is based on the study of ’difference’, to improve the further construction of new teaching building group.更多还原