【作者】 周磊；

【导师】 亢燕铭； 钟珂；

【作者基本信息】 东华大学 ， 供热、供燃气、通风与空调工程， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 房间换气次数的增加势必导致供暖房间能耗加大，顶棚辐射、散热器和热风等三种采暖方式由于供暖机理不同，形成的室内热环境特征不同，通风换气时产生的通风热损失也有所区别，为了提高大换气量房间的供暖节能效果，必须对不同供暖方式在大换气量情况下的热舒适性与节能效应进行研究。本文通过实测、理论分析与数值模拟结合的方法，讨论了现有供暖方式在卫生要求较高的工业厂房和民用公共建筑中的适用性。 实测结果表明，尽管冬季供暖通风带走大量热量，但对墙体壁面温度影响较小。顶棚辐射供暖墙体具有一定蓄热能力，使其节能性优于散热器供暖和热风供暖。在相同的能耗条件下，辐射供暖比散热器供暖和热风供暖的PMV值要高。此外，三种供暖方式的室内空气温度垂直分布规律与封闭房间内的情况差别较大，房间通风量较大时，人体活动区域内沿高度方向三种采暖方式产生的空气温度变化基本相同。可以认为，大换气量房间空气温度垂直分布状况主要与通风气流组织有关，而与供暖方式无关。 实测还指出，当通风量一定时，如何保证人体热舒适度不变而减少室内外气温差将成为大通风量房间节约采暖能耗的关键，本文结合围护结构传热机理，在对三种方式的能耗状况进行理论分析的基础上，提出了换气次数的节能临界值，若换气次数高于此值，则辐射供暖是较好的选择，否则，散热器供暖是较好的方法。 结合对实测数据的分析，本文对大通风量房间不同供暖方式下室内温度场和PMV分布进行了数值模拟。对三种供暖方式在不同换气次数条件下的温度场和PMV分布模拟结果显示，大换气量将造成室内一部分区域的不舒适性。分析结果后认为，PMV和室内温度分布是评价大换气量房间不同供暖方式室内热环境的重要参数，在这类房间中，辐射供暖和散热器供暖将各有优点，而热风供暖则是一种不宜采用的供暖方式。更多还原

【Abstract】 Energy consumption of heating rooms will increase when air exchange rate become large. Because the mechanisms of heating methods used currently, such as radiator heating, ceiling heating and warm-air heating, are different from each -other, the indoor thermal environment is not the same when each one of them employed for room heating. For enhancing energy efficiency of heating rooms, indoor thermal comfort and energy saving effects should be investigated when natural ventilation is used to make a good air quality indoors. In order to obtain the suitabilities of different heating methods in industrial and residential buildings, experimental and theoretical studies, and numerical simulations have been carried out in the present paper.The experimental data show that the inner surface temperature distributions of the testing room are affected lightly by ventilation process. The walls of the room heated by ceiling heating have energy storage ability, which makes its energy saving effect superior to conventional radiator heating and warm-air heating. The average PMV value indoor by ceiling heating is higher than the other two be used for room heating under same energy consumption, and the vertical distribution of indoor temperature results by either of the method in a heating room is different from that in a closed room. When air exchange rate is high, The vertical variations of temperatures in the zone of occupant action are similar by the three methods. Thus, the vertical indoor air temperature distribution in the high air exchange room is not mainly determined by heating method, but the way of air current.The experimental results indicate that when the air flow rate is determined, the key problem for energy saving is how to keep the indoor thermal comfort at a suitable level and reduce the difference between the internal and external temperature of the room. A formula is gained for calculating the critical values of air exchange rate. When ventilating rate is greater than the value, radiating heating is the better way for energy saving, or else, convection method in heating is more suitable.Numerical simulations are carried out by analyzing on the experimental data for discussing the indoor temperature field and PMV distribution under different ventilating rate and different heating method. Compared with the common situation, The result of numerical simulation shows that the cold air will result in an uncomfortable area indoors by using either of the method mentioned above. PMV and the indoor temperature field canbe used to evaluate the effect of heating in a large amount air current condition. The result of analysis indicate that the radiation heating and radiator heating have some advantages in such rooms, and hot-air heating is an unsuitable way for room heating.更多还原