【作者】 吴斌；

【导师】 宋世杰；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 法律， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 刑事附带民事诉讼案件一直是我国刑事审判实践中难以处理的案件。最高人民法院虽多次对此作出司法解释，但是成效不很显著，且所作出的司法解释和我国刑事诉讼法规定的刑事附带民事诉讼制度存在缺陷，司法解释与刑事诉讼法的规定及相关的民事法律也是相矛盾的。刑事附带民事诉讼的实体法本质应当是民事侵权行为之债，其程序法本质是民事侵权之诉。刑事附带民事诉讼是由于刑法与民法法条竞合所致，是当一种行为被刑法规定为犯罪行为，又同时被民法规定为民事侵权行为之时，引起的刑事民事合并之诉。正是由于两种诉讼根源于同一事实，因而产生了这两种诉讼合并进行的必要和可能。我国现行法律及司法解释将附带民事诉讼的案件范围界定为：就刑事案件来看，限定为侵犯人身权利的犯罪或者毁坏财物内容的犯罪；就民事损害来说，限定为物质损失而非精神损失。这样的规定是十分片面的，不利于充分保护被害人的民事权利。对于危害公共安全的犯罪、金融诈骗犯罪、侵犯知识产权犯罪、侵犯公民人身权利、民主权利的犯罪中涉及人身、财产及精神损害赔偿的内容均可提起刑事附带民事诉讼。本文通过对我国刑事附带民事诉讼制度的分析和探讨，提出了完善我国刑事附带民事诉讼的有关建议及思考。更多还原

【Abstract】 The case of civil suit collateral to criminal litigation has long been a difficulty in criminal-trial practice. The Supreme People’s Court has made judicial interpretations about civil suit collateral to criminal litigation time after time, but without remarkable effect. Meanwhile, many defects still exist in the judicial interpretations and criminal procedure law about the system of civil suit collateral to criminal litigation. In addition, the judicial interpretations are in contradiction with what the criminal procedure law and correlative civil law ordain. The essence of the substantive law of civil suit collateral to criminal litigation is obligations arising from civil torts, and the essence of procedural law is suit of the civil torts. Civil suit collateral to criminal litigation is a combined litigation for the coincidence of legal article of criminal law and civil law, which happens when an act is prescribed not only a crime by the criminal law but also a civil tort by the civil law. Given that these two litigations originate from the same facts, there comes the necessity and possibility of combining them. About the case scope of civil suit collateral to criminal litigation, the current law and judicial interpretations has summarized that to the criminal case, it is defined as the guilt of violating personal rights or destroying property; to the civil damage, and are not beneficial loss but not spiritual loss. Such regulations are one-sided, and are not beneficial to fully protect the civil rights of victim. The writer argues that civil suit collateral to criminal litigation can be applied to the compensation of person, property, and spiritual loss which are caused by the crimes of endangering country’s security, financial grift, infringing intellectual property, violating citizen’s personal rights and<WP=13>democratic rights. According to discussing and analyzing the system of civil suit collateral to criminal litigation, the thesis brings forward the suggestions and considerations on improving the system of civil suit collateral to criminal litigation.更多还原