【作者】 李红艳；

【导师】 徐朝贤；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 经济法学， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 反垄断法在美国被称为“自由企业的大宪章”。根据美国、德国和欧共体的立法经验，反垄断法在反对私人垄断方面至少应当规定三个方面的任务：禁止滥用垄断协议、禁止滥用市场支配地位、规制企业合并。这三个方面也被称为反垄断法实体法的三大支柱。经济全球化的浪潮使原本主要限于一国的企业合并呈现出明显的时代特征，对包括我国在内的众多国家的市场形成了强大的冲击，在我国主要表现为外资并购国企的狂潮。有鉴于此，本文以反垄断法中的企业合并作为主题，试图对如何在反垄断法中构建我国的企业合并规制制度予以探讨。 本文首先明确了反垄断法中企业合并的概念，分析了企业合并的价值；接着从立法和司法实践两个方面比较研究了美国、德国和欧共体的企业合并规制制度；继而探讨了经济全球化给企业合并规制带来的新挑战以及目前的应对办法；然后，本文着重阐述了出台我国反垄断法的必要性，明确提出应将企业合并规制制度作为其主要立法取向；最后就如何构建我国企业合并规制制度提出了立法建议。 本文认为：社会主义市场经济离不开竞争，市场经济正是通过竞争机制发挥作用，才能实现资源的优化配置。但是，市场本身没有维护自由和公平竞争的机制，所以需要竞争政策保护和促进竞争。市场经济是法制经济，自然应主要以法律手段保护竞争。同时，我国经济生活中业已出现由合并引起的经济垄断。因此，我国需要反垄断法，并应将企业合并作为其主要立法取向。美国、德国和欧共体的企业合并规制制度比较成熟，代表着当今企业合并规制制度的发展方向，由于我国对竞争法的研究起步较晚，因此借鉴国外的做法不失为一种解决问题的捷径。美国、欧共体等在合并规制制度上既有共性又存在差异。从立法模式上，美国由结构主义向行为主义转化，而德国和欧共体奉行的是行为主义。面对全球经济化浪潮，一国的反垄断法显得苍白无力，美国等在确定⑧硕士学位论文MA别尼R，5 THESIS其反垄断法的域外效力的基础上，积极寻求通过发达国家之间的双边协议解决当代企业合并带来的问题。由于双边协议的局限性，很多反垄断法专家致力于研究统一的国际合并规制制度，但从目前的情况来看，统一的国际合并规制制度只能是一种理想。结合我国经济发展实际情况，我国企业合并规制制度应确立行为主义的立法模式，并应强调该制度在保护竞争的同时，注意该制度与国家产业政策的协调，在适用该制度时要特别强调经济分析，注重对消费者、小企业、社会公共利益和国家利益的保护，。鉴于目前建立统一的国际合并规制制度只是一种理想状态，我国企业合并规制制度应明确其域外效力，并积极主动地参与国际合作，寻求通过多边协议的方式解决对我国国内市场竞争产生影响的企业合并引起的限制竞争的问题。我国企业合并规制的实体法标准应是企业合并是否对竞争产生实质性限制或严重损害竞争。同时，在我国企业合并规制制度中应明确企业合并的含义和事前申报制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 The anti-monopoly law is known as "Magna Carat of the free enterprises" in U.S.A. According to legislative experience of U.S.A., Germany, EC, the anti-monopoly law at least has defined three rules in object to private monopoly, which are forbidding abusing monopoly agreement, markets dominant status and regulating enterprises merger. These three respects are considered as three major pillars of entity law of anti-monopoly law. The tide of economic globalization makes the enterprises merger which was limited in one country before have obvious times characteristic and makes strong impact on numerous countries market, including our country. In our country, It is mainly shown as the overbearing tide that the foreign capitals merger the state-owned enterprises. In view of this, this thesis is selected title of enterprises merger of anti-monopoly law. I attempt to inquire into how to construct the regulation institution of enterprises merger in our country anti-monopoly law.In this thesis, I define the concept of enterprises merger in anti-monopoly law at first and analyze the value of enterprises merger. Secondly, I study the regulation institution of enterprises merger of U.S.A., Germany, and EC from the view of legislation and justice practice. Then I investigate new challenges and present way of replying which economic globalization gives regulation of enterprises merger. Then I explain necessity of issue of anti-monopoly law in our country, and point out that regulation of enterprises merger is regarded as its main legislative orientation clearly. Finally, I give my legislative suggestion on how to construct the regulation institution of enterprises merger in our country.In this thesis, I think socialistic market economy can’t do without the competition. Market economy act just through competition mechanism and realize the rational distribution of resources. But market itself does not have and maintain free and fair competitive mechanism. So competition policy is required to protect and promote competition. Market economy is the legal economy and competition should mainly be protected by legal means naturally. Our country needs anti-monopoly law and enterprises merger is regarded as its main legislativeorientation. The regulation of enterprises merger of U.S.A., Germany, and EC relatively matures and represents developing direction of the regulation of enterprises merger nowadays. The study on the competition law of our country starts relatively late. Drawing lessons from the foreign method can yet be regarded as a kind of shortcut of solving the problem here. There is commonness as well as difference in the regulation institution of merger among U.S.A., Germany and EC. From the legislative mode, U.S.A. is transformed to behaviorism from structuralism, while Germany and EC pursue behaviorism. U.S.A. and other countries confirm overseas force of their anti-monopoly law and actively seek to solve the contemporary problem on enterprises merger through the bilateral cooperation between the developed countries in the face of tide of global economy. Because of limitation of bilateral agreement, a lot of anti-monopoly law experts devote to study unified regulation institution of world merger. According to present situation, it only can be a kind of ideal to unify regulation institution of world merger. According to our country economic developing conditions, the regulation institution of enterprises merger in our country should establish legislative mode of behaviorism and also emphasize that the regulation should pay attention to protection of consumer, small enterprises, social public interests and to benefit of country while protecting competition. As it is only a kind of ideal state to set up unified regulation institution of world merger at present, the regulation institution of enterprises merger of our country should be defined its overseas force, and we should actively participate in international cooperation, seek to solve enterprises merger through multilateral way of更多还原