惩罚性赔偿制度研究

【作者】 李晶珠；

【导师】 蓝承烈；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 民商法学， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 惩罚性赔偿制度是英美法特有的一种民事责任形式，近些年该制度在大陆法国家及我国引起很大争论。本文首先从理论上阐明了该制度具有很强的预防功能，符合现代民法的精神，与公法与私法的划分、民刑分离、不当得利这些民法基本理论并不矛盾，是补偿性民事责任的必要补充，因此具有存在的合理性。但惩罚性赔偿制度是双刃剑，对该制度的适用应掌握合适的度，因此其对适用范围、条件，额度应有所限制，方能发挥其积极作用。在我国不宜广泛适用惩罚性赔偿，但在民事侵权行为十分严重，现有的法律制度不足以有效遏制的一些特殊领域，可以适用惩罚性赔偿。更多还原

【Abstract】 Punitive damages is a special form of civil liability in common law, in recent years, civil law countries and China begin to pay attention to it. First, this paper illustrates that punitive damages has strong prevention function, at the same time it accords with the inspirit of civil law of modern times, it doesn’t conflict with basic theories of civil law, such as the partition of public law and private law, the separation of civil law and criminal law and unjust benefit, it is also the necessary supplement of compensatory civil liability, therefore it has the rationality of being. But punitive damages is a sword with double blades, we should hold a appropriate limit in using it, hence, in order to exert it’s positive function, we should set a limitation to it’s scope of applying, condition and the amount of punitive damages. Punitive damages isn’t suitable to be applied widely in nowadays in our country, but in some unusual areas where torts is very serious and the existing law isn’t sufficient, we can use it.更多还原