论无权处分

【作者】 史立伟；

【导师】 蓝承烈；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 民商法学， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 无权处分制度是合同法颁布以来倍受争议的一项制度。本文从合同效力角度入手，买卖合同既发生债权效力，同时也是发生物权效力的直接依据。分析无权处分合同效力应建立在区分债权效力与物权效力基础之上的。处分权不应影响买卖合同的债权效力。从比较法上的考察，大多数大陆法系国家与英美法系国家以及国际公约都肯定无权处分合同债权性效力，这是世界立法的发展趋势。肯定无权处分合同债权性效力在维护善意第三人利益基础上兼顾了权利人的利益。相反的，合同法第51条对相对人与交易安全的保护是很不利的。无权处分理论魅力就在于它与民法上诸多制度相互关联，而合同法第51条规定同民法体系之间存在着不和谐。更多还原

【Abstract】 Unauthorized Disposition Rule has evoked much controversy since Contract Law was enacted. The author attempts to analyse that the contract of sale, by itself, has an effect of obligation and can also directly produce the passing of property. An analysis of the different effects of Unauthorized Disposition should be carried out on the basis of distinction between the effect of obligation and the effect of change of real right. The right of disposal should not affect the effect of the obligation.By means of the method of comparison, the author argues that most of countries of Continental Law System and Anglo-American Legal System stipulate the contract of Unauthorized Disposition as valid contract, so do the international treaties, and it is the tendency of the world legislation. Recognizing of the effect of obligation can protect not only the interest of the third party but also the interest of the obligee. On the contrary, article 51 is unfavorable for the protection of the third party and deal safety. The theoretical power of Unauthorized Disposition lies in its close association with the illegal profits, bona fide gain, security for defects of right ect. There exists contradiction between the system of civil law and article 51.更多还原