【作者】 罗燕飞；

【导师】 王建军；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 民商法学， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 商标侵权损害赔偿的基本理论和具体制度的完善是商标侵权领域内的重要研究课题之一，对于保护商标权，制裁商标侵权行为人，维护商标权人合法利益具有重大意义。本文主要对商标侵权行为的对象——商标权、商标侵权行为、商标侵权损害赔偿、完善我国商标侵权损害赔偿制度做了深入的研究，以期为我国商标侵权损害赔偿制度的发展和完善尽一点微薄之力。 商标侵权行为的对象是商标权，这是商标侵权损害赔偿制度的基础。商标权，是指注册商标所有人对注册商标依法所享有的权利。长期以来，许多学者认为商标权等于商标专用权。本文对这两个概念从内容和属性上作了区分，提出商标权与商标专用权是整体与局部的关系。进而，详细论证商标权与传统物权、知识产权的不同之处，商标权客体的特殊性，商标权的具体内容和权利范围的限制，为下文的写作奠定了基础。 商标侵权行为是侵害他人注册商标权益的行为。商标侵权行为不仅是侵害商标权和消费者的合法权益的行为，同时也是一种不正当竞争行为，这是商标侵权行为的特殊性质。同时，商标侵权行为的成立并不以行为人主观上是否存在过错为前提，这是商标侵权行为与一般侵权行为的重大区别。商标侵权行为在现实生活中有着各式各样的表现形式，如未经商标注册人的许可，在同一种商品或者类似商品上使用与其注册商标相同或者近似的商标。随着经济的快速发展和科学技术的日新月异，商标侵权行为不再局限于传统的表现形式，出现了商标与域名的冲突等新情况。 其次，是关于商标侵权损害赔偿的基本理论。商标侵权损害赔偿突破了传统损害赔偿的功能，具有预防、回复两大功能，商标侵权损害赔偿在性质上属于补偿性损害赔偿，具体表现为回复权利人未受损害时之状态。对于商标侵权损害赔偿的归责原则问题，本文从过错推定原则是一独立的归责原则，过错推定原则在商标侵权损害赔偿领域的独特作用几个方面详细论证了商标侵权损害赔偿的归责原则—过错推定原则。在归责原则的指导下，确立商标侵权损害赔偿责任的四大构成要件:行为、损害、因果关系、过错。 最后，完善我国商标侵权损害赔偿制度。我国关于商标侵权损害赔偿制度的立法存在侵权损害赔偿数额确定的标准不明确等缺陷。在上述论证的基础上，本文提出了以“被侵权人因侵权期间因侵权所受到的损失”为确定损害赔偿数额的首要标准，并指出了具体的内容。同时，提出了法定赔偿制度的具体构想，即明确法定赔偿适用的对象为侵权行为对每件商标造成的损害，确定具体损害赔偿额时应考虑的具体因素和细化赔偿幅度，建立等级法定赔偿制度。介于驰名商标对于商标权人的重要意义，提出建立对驰名商标特殊的侵权损害赔偿制度，即适用无过错的归责原则制度，将被侵害商标本身具有的知名度等作为确定损害赔偿额的首要考虑因素和可突破法定赔偿额“50万元”的上限。更多还原

【Abstract】 The basic theories of the trademark infringement indemnity is a trademark infringement realm inside important to study with the concrete institutional and perfect one of the lessons, for protect the trademark power, sanctions trademark infringement behavior person, support the legal benefits in person in power in trademark has the great significance. This text was main to do the thorough research to behavioral objects in infringements in trademarks power, trademarks infringements behavior, trademarks infringement indemnity, perfect our countries trademark infringements indemnity systems, realizes with the period perfect our trademark infringement indemnity system, realize the institutional and social function in indemnity takes place with the basic purpose that suppress the trademark infringement behavior.The behavioral object in infringement in trademark is a trademark power, this is the trademark infringement indemnity system degree ?Trademark power, is a right to point the registration trademark owner to register the trademark possess by law. For long time, many scholars thinks that the trademark power is equal to the trademark appropriation power. This text to these two concepts is from the contents with belong to the sex ascended to make the distinction, putting forward the trademark power is the whole with trademark appropriation power and partial relation. Then, detailed argument trademark power different from traditional real right, intelligent property right of a special for, trademark power, the concrete contents of the trademark powerwith the restrict of the right scope, composed to establish t for the continuation ?The trademark infringement behavior is a behavior to violate others register the trademark rights. The trademark infringement behavior is not only the behavior of the legal rights to violate the trademark power with the consumer, also is a kind of being to compete the behavior falsely, this is the behavioral and special kind in infringement in trademark. At the same time, the trademark infringement establishes behaviorally and not with behavior the person is subjective to whether to exsit fault or not up for premise, this is the trademark infringement behavior to distinct with behavioral graveness in general infringement. The trademark infringement behavior has got the assorted manifestation in realistic life, if have not yet the permission that trademark register person, in the same kind of merchandise ising similar to perhaps merchandise usage with its register the trademark the homology perhaps the trademark that look like. Along with the economic fast development and technical continuous changes and improvements in science, the trademark infringement behavior no longer limits at the traditional manifestation, appearing the trademark and the new circumstance in etc. in clash of the area.The next in order, is a basic theories concerning trademark infringement indemnity. The trademark infringement indemnity broke the function of the traditional indemnity, having the prevention and replies two greatest function, the trademark infringement indemnity belongs to the in expiation of indemnity on the kind, expressing in a specific way for reply right the person is not damaged to harm the appearance of the hour. Return trademark infringement indemnity return the matter of principle of, this text from fault predict outcome principle is a very much the principle of, the fault predicts outcome the principle in the aspects of the special function of the trademark infringement indemnity realm a few ly detailed argumentthe trademark infringement indemnity returns the principle-fault predictsoutcome the principle. Is next at the leading that return the principle of, the behavior of the establishment trademark infringement indemnity duty, injure( not yet include physically the damage that result in), cause and effect relation, fault four greatest composings important item.Finally, perfect our country trademark infringement indemnity system. The concerning institutional l更多还原