【作者】 杨建成；

【导师】 李先波；

【作者基本信息】 湖南师范大学 ， 国际法学， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 由于知识产权具有地域性特征，很长时间以来各国法院只受理侵犯本国知识产权的案件，而不受理就外国知识产权提起的诉讼。这种管辖权制度造成的结果是，所有的知识产权案件一律适用法院地法(内国法)，外国法根本没有适用的可能，因而外国法和内国法不会竞相适用于某一案件，当然也就不会产生法律冲突。但随着科学技术的不断发展以及国际交往的不断加深，知识产权的地域特征开始被打破，许多国家对传统的管辖权制度进行了变革：一国法院不仅受理侵犯本国知识产权的案件，也受理就外国知识产权提起的诉讼。这种变革使内外国法都有适用于案件的可能，从而产生了知识产权的法律冲突。 解决知识产权法律冲突的方法有两种，即统一实体法和冲突法。二者各有利弊，都有存在的必要。各国在确立知识产权的法律适用制度时，大都坚持知识产权的地域性原则。但在复杂的知识产权案件(即一个侵权行为产生几个侵权行为地)中，仅仅依靠传统的连结点选择准据法是不够的，而应根据最密切联系原则、意思自治原则等灵活的法律选择方法选择法律。在这种情况下，知识产权突破地域性的限制已是不可避免。因此，各国必须加强交流与合作，在一定范围内承认知识产权的域外效力，并相互承认和执行对方法院的裁定和判决。 最后，笔者结合了我国的司法实践分析了我国知识产权的法律适用制度，在此基础上为制定和完善我国的知识产权冲突法提出了一些建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 Owing to the territorial character of intellectual property right, each country simply accepted cases concerning its own intellectual property rights without considering those concerning foreign countries’ over a long period of time, and the result of this practice is that the law applied in the case was always domestic law and no foreign law was applicable. That is, according to the jurisdiction, the situation that domestic law and foreign law compete to be applicable in the same case would never appear, and hence the conflict of law wouldn’t occur. However, with the development of the science and technology as well as the deepening of the international exchanges, the territorial character of intellectual property right has been broken through. Many countries have reformed the jurisdiction, stipulating that the court should accept the cases over intellectual property rights not only concerning its own country but also concerning foreign countries. Such a reform makes both domestic law and foreign law applicable in the same case, the conflict of law of intellectual property right occurs.There are two methods of resolving the conflict of law of intellectual property right, i.e. the uniform substantive rules and conflict rules. Both of them are of advantages and disadvantages, and both of them are necessary. Every country insists on the territorial character of intellectual property right in establishing the rules of application of law. In complicated cases of intellectual property right (i.e. cases involving two or more than two places of tort), choosing applicable law by traditional connecting factor is not enough, then the flexible methods such as the rule of autonomy of will and the theory of proximate connection must be used. In view of the above-mentioned facts, the break-through of the territorial character of intellectual property right is inevitable. It is quite necessary for all countries to strengthen their communication and cooperationmutually admitting the extraterritorial effect of intellectual property right within certain limits, admitting and executing the arbitration and sentences of the courts of their counterparts.The author analyzes our country’s rules of application of law on the basis of the judicial practice in the field of intellectual property right, and proposes some suggestions on the establishment and perfection of our country’s conflict rules of intellectual property right.更多还原