徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪研究

【作者】 张晓玉；

【导师】 钊作俊；

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 ， 法律， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 本文除引言外，正文共分四部分，约3万字。 第一部分：徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪的概念和构成特征。介绍了该罪的概念、立法渊源和构成特征，分析了主客观要件。 第二部分：徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪与其他犯罪的界限。从不同主体和不移交刑事案件性质的不同剖析了本罪与其他相关犯罪的区别。重点分析了本罪与徇私枉法罪、包庇罪、包庇毒品犯罪分子罪、放纵走私罪、放纵制售伪劣商品犯罪行为罪的界限。 第三部分：徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪的司法适用。就本罪在司法实践中有关“行政执法人员”范围、“徇私”情形认定、本罪成立的前提条件、“犯罪对象”界定、“一罪数罪”以及“共同犯罪”等突出的问题加以研讨。 第四部分：完善徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪的立法建议。对于本罪的完善，主要建议有：单位应当成为本罪的主体；在罪状中删除“徇私舞弊”和“情节严重”两个要件，将本罪罪名确定为刑事不移交罪。因为本罪设立目的与是否徇私无关系，而且也难以查证，况且是否舞弊同不移交事件并无必然关系，但可以将该要件作为加重情节加以规定；修改其法定刑，以改变其法定刑同具有徇私舞弊情节的滥用职权罪的法定刑相比过轻的状况。更多还原

【Abstract】 In addition to an introduction, the main body of this paper comprises four parts, containing about thirty thousand Chinese characters.Part One: The concept and constitutive characteristics of the crime of irregularities for favoritism so as not to turn over criminal cases. This part describes the crime’s concept, legislative sources and constitutive characteristics, and analyses the crime’s subjective and objective essentials.Part Two: The differences between the crime of irregularities for favoritism so as not to turn over criminal cases and other crimes. It is analyzed that the differences between this crime and other related crimes lie in different subjects and natures of criminal cases not turned over. A special analysis is made of the distinction between this crime and the crimes of bending the law to serve one’s personal considerations for favoritism, harboring criminals, harboring drug criminals, giving free rein to smuggling, and giving free rein to criminal acts of manufacturing or selling fake or inferior commodities.Part Three: The judicial application of the crime of irregularities for favoritism so as not to turn over criminal cases. The prominent issues occurring in the judicial practice of this crime are discussed such as the scope of "administrative law enforcement personnel", determination of the circumstances for "practicing favoritism", preconditions for establishing this crime, definition of the "targets of crime", "one crime and plural crimes", and "complicity".Part Four: Several suggestions to further perfect the crime of irregularities for favoritism so as not to turn over criminal cases. To perfect this crime, it is suggested that an institution should become a subject of this crime and this crime be renamed Crime of Not Turning Over Criminal Cases, from which two essential elements of "irregularities for favoritism" and "gravity of the circumstances" are deleted. The purpose of designing this crime is independent of the presence or absence of irregularities for favoritism, which are difficult to check and verify. The presence or absence of irregularities for favoritism is not bound to relate to the not-turning-over event. However, the irregularities for favoritism can be taken as an aggravated circumstance. Moreover, it is suggested that the statutory sentence of this crime be altered to put an end to the situation of its statutory sentence being much lighter than that for the crime of abusing the office with circumstances of irregularities for favoritism.更多还原