【作者】 魏晓娟；

【导师】 冯维；

【作者基本信息】 西南师范大学 ， 发展与教育心理学， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 欺负行为是普遍存在于中小学中的一种侵犯行为。我国此项研究开展的较晚，现有的研究主要停留于调查分析欺负行为现状的层面，尚未针对欺负卷入儿童自身特点进行探讨。儿童之所以欺负他人和受人欺负，与其在人际冲突情境下解决问题的方式有关，而自我概念是人格的核心部分，制约着行为的反应方式，必将影响儿童欺负行为及人际冲突解决策略。因此，本研究就欺负卷入儿童的自我概念和人际冲突解决策略特点进行了考察。 根据问卷调查和访谈的结果，本研究得出如下结论： 1．小学校园里欺负问题比较严重，卷入到欺负行为中的小学生比率较高。 2．小学3—6年级儿童的自我概念存在差异，3、4年级学生的自我概念水平高于5、6年级，5年级学生的自我概念水平最低。 3．不同欺负类型儿童的自我概念不同，其自我概念存在年级、性别差异。5、6年级欺负儿童的自我概念高于其他各类儿童。受欺负儿童的运动能力自我最低，且在自我概念其他维度上低于一般儿童；3、4年级各类型儿童的自我概念除运动能力外，在其他维度上不存在显著差异；欺负男生在运动能力、生理外貌、一般自我、自我总分上与其他欺负类型男生差异显著。受欺负男生的运动自我、生理自我评价最低，欺负／受欺负男生总体自我概念最低；除生理外貌外，女生不同类型儿童的自我概念差异不显著。 4．欺负卷入儿童对模糊情境的归因认知上与一般儿童相比存在显著差异。总体来说，欺负卷入儿童在意图识别方面存在着困难。对情境线索的认知方面，小学3-6年级儿童不存在年级差异。 5．不同类型儿童的人际冲突解决策略不同，冲突情境影响儿童的人际冲突解决策略。轻微冲突情境下，各种类型的儿童采用的策略没有显著差异。模糊伤害、故意伤害情境中，不同欺负类型儿童采取的解决策略有显著的不同。在求助策略的运用上，受欺负儿童明显少于其他类型儿童，其不良情绪较多。不同类型儿童对策略的原因解释也不相同。 6．模糊和故意伤害情境中自我概念对人际冲突解决策略有影响作用。高自我概念者多采用攻击、求助策略，低自我概念儿童的退缩、不良情绪较多；自我概念高低不同水平儿童对冲突策略作的解释也不相同；轻微冲突情境下儿童的人际冲突解决策略不存在自我概念水平的差异。更多还原

【Abstract】 The bullying exists commonly in the primary and middle schools as a type of aggression which caused extensive concern in the world. In China, the study on bullying has been carried out later and it stays the descriptive level by investigating and analyzing the current situation of the bullying, without exploring the characteristics of the children involved in bullying. The bully and bullied are connected with children’s personal conflict problem-solving style. As the core of personality, self-concept restricts the response style, which is sure to influence the bullying behavior and personal conflict problem-solving style.By applying questionnaire investigation and investigation, the study gets the results as follows:1. The bullying problem is very serious in primary school and lots of students involved in the bullying.2 There is a significant difference in self-concept of different graders. The level of 3^ graders’ self-concept is higher than 5-6 graders. The 5-gaders have the lowest level of self-concept.3. The self-concepts of the bully, victim and bully/victim are different which also differ from grade and gender. To the 5-6 graders, the bully’s self-concept is the highest, there are significant difference between the bully’s physical ability, appearance, school-self, general-self and the total score from the normal child. The victim’s physical ability is the lowest and the score of the other aspects of self are all lower than the normal. To the 3-4 graders, there is no significant difference in all aspects of self but physical ability; To boys, there are significant difference between the bully’s physical ability, appearance, general-self and the total score and the other child involved bullying; the victim have the lowest physical ability and appearance; Generally speaking, the self-concept of the bully/victim is the lowest, To girls, there is no significant difference in their self-concept between the four types of child but in the appearance.4. There is a significant difference in intent cognition between child involved in bullying and the normal child. In fuzzy conflict, the child involved in bullying can’t discern the other’s intent while the normal can do In this aspect, the difference between 3-6 graders’ is not significant.5. The personal conflict problem-solving strategy differs from the types of child and the conflict situation. There is no significant difference in slight conflict situation. In fuzzy and intent injury, the bully use more aggression, the victim attend to withdraw and the bully/victim use more aggression and more withdrawal, while the normal child applies the communication and consultation to solve the conflict. The victim’s help-seeking strategy is significantly fewer than the others’ Their Explanation of strategy-using are also different.6. Self-concept affects the personal conflict problem-solving strategy in fuzzy and intent situations in which child of high level self-concept use more aggression and help-seeking, while the child who has lower self-concept use more withdraw and bad mood. In slight conflict situation, child’s problem-solving strategy doesn’t significantly differ from the level of self-concept.更多还原