【作者】 叶仲耀；

【导师】 李交发；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 刑法学， 2002， 硕士

【摘要】 私放在押人员罪是一种性质十分严重的渎职犯罪。它破坏了司法制度及司法机关的正常活动；使刑事在押人员脱逃法律的制裁、教育和改造；危害了国家安全和社会秩序；损坏了国家司法机关及其工作人员的声誉，诱发公众对刑法和司法公正认同感的衰减。刑法分则第四百条第一款对该罪作了规定。但目前刑法理论界对该罪的研究一方面过于浅显且零散，多见于教材几百字的表述；另一方面在该罪的理论和实践层面一直存在诸多争议；同时，该罪在立法方面也存在一定的缺陷。 基于此，笔者拟就该罪作一番详尽系统的研究。本文第一章史篇部分考察了本罪的起源和演变，认为《吕刑》中关于司法官责任的规定就已包含本罪，且最早规定是在秦朝的《秦墓竹简》中，并对《唐律》的有关规定进行分析和总结，后对新旧刑法关于本罪的规定进行比较。第二章罪篇就该罪的一些理论问题进行研究，认为本罪罪名应定为“私放刑事在押人员罪”。本罪的概念应为：“司法工作人员利用职务上的便利，私自非法释放在押的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人或罪犯的行为。”之后对该罪犯罪构成诸要件进行分析。第三章罪篇就该罪在司法实践中的若干问题进行探讨。最后一章刑篇分析本罪的配刑原则及刑种完善。认为该罪配刑方面体现了两大原则：从严处罚和平等量刑；但附加刑的缺失使本罪刑罚方面尚显不足，有待完善，应当增设罚金刑和剥夺政治权利刑。更多还原

【Abstract】 As a serious crime of dereliction of duty, Crime of releasing the person held in custody without authorization destroys the activities in gear of judiciary and judicial organ: helping the person held in custody escape from punishment, instruction and reconstruction of law; damaging the national security and social order; impairing the reputation of judicial organ and its staff; placing a premium on the decline of public identification with criminal law and judicial justice. Although the first paragraph in the four hundredth article of Criminal Law section has such crime prescribed, research on such crime in the circle of criminal law study is too superficial and scattered, which often showed in the enunciation of only hundreds words in teaching materials. On the other hand, there are many disputations in the level of theory and practice and defect in the legislation of such crime as well.In view of this, the author attempts to make a systemic research on such crime at large. Chapter 1 of this article reviews the origin and revolution of such crime the author thinks which included in the relate stipulation about responsibility of law-officer in Criminal Codes Made by Lu and firstly seen in the Bamboo Slips Excavated from Tomb in Chin Dynasty, therefore makes an analysis and summary on the certain stipulations of Law Codes of the Tang Dynasty and compares the stipulation of both old and new criminal law on such crime. Chapter 2 puts a research on some theoretic issues of such crime and holds the definition of such crime of releasing the criminal person held in custody without authorization. The concept of such crime should be: the act of the judicial staff by using the convenience of duty to relieve the suspect, the defendant and offender in custody without authorization. The author also makes an analysis on the elements of crime constitution on suchcrime. Chapter 3 gives an exploration on certain issues in the judicial practice of such crime. The last chapter presents an analysis on the punishment principle and kind of punishments perfection. Two principles, punishing severely and punishing equally, are embodied in the punishment of such crime although the absence of afflict punishment brings some pity. It is necessary to establish the punishment of fine and deprivation of politic right for the consummation of such crime.更多还原