特殊防卫的理论与实践

【作者】 崔海梅；

【导师】 吴平；

【作者基本信息】 浙江师范大学 ， 马克思主义理论与思想政治教育， 2002， 硕士

【摘要】 新刑法增设了第20条第3款。该款一出台引起了强烈的反响，刑法学界普遍认为这一款是对“防卫过当”的否定，是关于“无限防卫权”的立法。因此对这一款的利弊和存废之争就成为了学者们争论的热点。笔者认为这一款其实是对第一款正当防卫的补充性规定，是对某些特殊犯罪的正当防卫的特别规定。应称之“特殊防卫”。在此基础上，笔者系统而详细地阐述了特殊防卫的诸多理论和实践问题。全文共分三部分： 第一、二部分通过对刑法第20条第3款的各种命名进行分析，提出应称之“特殊防卫”，既而详细论述了特殊防卫防卫权的嬗变、防卫权的价值探析、特殊防卫的性质、特殊防卫的构成等理论问题。 第三部分就司法实践中经常遇到的特殊防卫的举证责任、对无责任人的特殊防卫和对转化犯的特殊防卫等问题展开论述，以期进一步推动对这一立法的深入理解和探讨。更多还原

【Abstract】 The additional 20-3rd article stipulation drawn up in the revised criminal law causes the strong repercussion. The scholars generally think that it is a legislation of the right of unlimited defense that denies the "imperfect self-defense". So, the advantages, disadvantages of this article and whether it should be abolished are becoming the points at issue. The author thinks the article actually is a supplementary regulation of justifiable defense and a special regulation against justifiable defense of some special crimes. So, we should call "special justifiable defense". Based on it, the author sets forth some opinions on the theory and practice in a systematic and detailed way. The thesis is divided into three parts:The first and second part puts up the term "special justifiable defense" by analyzing the various names of the 20-3rd article stipulation, then discusses in detail the theories about the evolution of the self-defense right, the probe to the value of the self-defense, the nature of special justifiable defense and the requisites to constitute the special justifiable defense.The third part brings exposition to the judicial problems like responsibility of proofs and the special defense against the persons bearing no criminal capacity of responsibility and the transforming crime, expected to push the comprehension and discussion to the legislation.更多还原