论滥用职权罪

【作者】 宋应红；

【导师】 鲁嵩岳；

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 ， 刑法学， 2000， 硕士

【摘要】 滥用职权罪是97刑法第397条第1款规定的一种危害十分严重的渎职罪。由于法条的规定过于简略，该罪在理论和实践中引起较多争议。本文对此罪试作一点探讨。 全文共分5个部分。 第一部分：滥用职权罪的历史沿革。 第二部分：滥用职权罪的概念及犯罪构成。1、滥用职权罪的犯罪概念。2、滥用职权罪的犯罪构成。本罪的客体是国家机关工作人员职权行为的正当性；本罪的客观方面表现为行为人必须实施了违反职守的行为，也必须是在从事公务的管理活动中与管理活动本身有关的行为，并且该行为与危害结果之间必须存在内在的联系。本罪的主体是国家机关工作人页。本罪的主观方面是故意，包括直接故意和间接故意。 第三部分：滥用职权罪的认定。包括：1、罪与非罪的界限；2、本罪与其他滥用职权罪的区分；3、本罪与玩忽职守罪的区别，认为二罪的唯一区别在于主观方面，即滥用职权罪是故意，玩忽职守罪是过失。 第四部分：滥用职权罪的处罚。认为在确定该罪行为人的刑事责任时必须考虑重大损失的程度和其他犯罪情节的轻重，并论述了该罪主体刑事责任的分担问题。 第五部分：滥用职权罪的立法比较及立法完善。本文介绍了其他国家滥用职权罪的规定，并针对我国刑法在该罪上的缺陷，提出了自己的立法建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 Abusing - power crime,which is an extremely serious crime of dereliction of duty, is provided in Article 392.7 ,Section 1 of Criminal Law (1997). But this stipulation is so simple that there are various interpretations both in theoiy and in practice. So the exploratory opinion is giwn on this subject in this essay.This essay includes five parts.Part I is on the history of abusing -power ciime in China.Part II 1.The concept of abusing- power crime.2.The constitutive requisites of abusing-power crime.The author argues that the crime violates the requirements of fiiffiliing Igally.their duties for functionaries of a stste organ .The objective aspect of abusing-power crime must be the action occuring in and relating to the management of public affairs and go against duty.The auther holds that there should essentially exist and inner link between the action of abusing-power and hamful consequences.The author holds that the subject of the abusing-power crime should be any functionary of a state organ. The author argues that the subjective aspect of abusing-power crime is intemtional.Part III focuses on distingushing abusing-power crime from the other conducts. The author tries to make a clear distinction between the crime in Article 397 and other specifc abusing-power crime,between crime and noncrime,between abusingpower crime and neglecting-duty crime. The only difference between abusing-power crime and neglecting-duty crime is that the former is intentional and the latter is negligent.Part IV Centers punishment of abusing-power crime. The author holds that the degree of heavy losses and the seriousness of other criminal circumstunces must be taken into account when deterining the criminal responsibility of the conductwhether and how the subjects of this crime bear and share the crinuinl responsibilityis then discussed.Part V is about abusing-power crime in other countries and the defect of abusing-power crime in China .Some suggestions arc made to make it more perfect更多还原