【作者】 陈文刚；

【导师】 汪振江；

【作者基本信息】 兰州大学 ， 诉讼法学（专业学位）， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 随着判例制度的不断完善和判例法优越性的日渐显现,大陆法系国家开始认识到判例法的巨大作用,特别是判例法在克服成文法局限性方面所发挥的特殊功能,已得到普遍认可。作为大陆法系国家,我国如何顺应现代司法改革的大潮流,对判例法进行引进与吸收,也成为国内法学界热议的焦点。当前,我国正处于社会转型的关键时期,各类矛盾和纠纷问题比较突出,人民法院特别是基层人民法院受理的案件有增多趋势,一些新型而复杂、典型而实用的案例逐渐出现。与此同时,“同案不同判”现象时有发生,这在一定程度上阻碍了我国法治建设的进程。值得一提的是,2005年10月26日,最高人民法院发布的《人民法院第二个五年改革纲要(2004--2008)》第13项明确提出要“建立和完善案例指导制度”,这为我国案例指导制度的建立与完善,在某种程度上指明了方向。那么,基于我国当前法制建设的现实需要,以及我国大陆与台湾地区共同的法律渊源和成文法传统,在进行司法改革的时候,我国大陆地区适当地借鉴台湾地区的判例制度,以更好地为我国社会主义的法治建设服务,也是应有的题中之义。不过,对于案例指导制度的法律定位,在我国仍是一个极具争议的热点问题。例如,有学者认为,从法律文化传统的角度看,我国以成文法为法律渊源,因而反对在我国建立案例指导制度；也有学者认为,建立案例指导制度是十分必要的,这对于弥补成文法缺陷,规范法官自由裁量权、保障司法公平和正义、维护法律权威、统一法律适用,具有重要的现实意义。对此,本文将结合对台湾地区判例制度的优越性、局限性和功能价值以及法律定位分析,来研究探讨我国大陆地区案例指导制度的法律定位问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the constant improvement of precedent system and the gradual emerging of case law superiority, the continental law system countries begin to realize the case law, particularly a special function that plays in overcoming limitations of statute law, which has been widely recognized. As one of the civil law countries, how to conform to the trend of modern judicial reform in our country, and carry on the introduction and absorption of case law, also become the focus of domestic legal science buzz.At present, our country is in a critical period of social transformation, all kinds of contradictions and disputes problems stand out, especially the ease that the grassroots people’s court of the people’s court accepts has increasing trend, and some new and complex, typical and practical cases appeared gradually. At the same time, the "connection with different sentence" phenomenon occurs frequently, which to some extent, hindered the process of rule of law construction in China. It is worth mentioning, on October26,2005, promulgated by the supreme people’s court of the people’s court of the second five-year reform outline (2004-2008)"13explicitly proposed to "set up and improve the case guidance system ", this is the establishment and perfection of case guidance system in our country, pointed out the direction to a certain extent. Then, based on the current reality of legal construction in our country, and the Chinese mainland and Taiwan region, common law and statute law and tradition, at the time of the judicial reform, the Chinese mainland areas properly refer to the case system in Taiwan, in order to better serve China’s socialist legal construction, also is one characteristic of due.For the case guidance system, however, the legal position, in our country is still a controversial hot issue. For example, the scholar thinks, from the perspective of traditional legal culture, the statute law is legal origin in our country, thus against the case guidance system in our country; Also the scholar thinks, to establish the case guidance system is very necessary. It can make up for the defects of the statute law in standardizing judge discretion, guaranteeing judicial fairness and justice, to safeguard the unity of the legal authority, legal application, which has important practical significance. To this, this article will combine the analysis of the advantages, the limitations and the function value as well as the legal position of case system in Taiwan, to study and discuss the legal orientation of the case guidance system in mainland China.更多还原