【作者】 李玉婷；

【导师】 周桂党；

【作者基本信息】 兰州大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 我国正处在一个社会转型的关键时期,利益关系和利益格局的变化引发了各种激烈冲突和矛盾,现实生活中存在着大量公共利益受到侵犯,但却得不到司法救助的情况。因此,无论是从法理还是实践的角度分析,行政公益诉讼制度的推行在我国具有很强的现实性和针对性。本文拟在肯定了我国应该建立行政公益诉讼的大背景下,对其核心问题,即原告资格的问题进行了深入研究。文章总共分为四个部分。文章第一部分是行政公益诉讼案例介绍。通过列举两个案情相似但被作出不同判决的案件,意在引申出我国推行行政公益诉讼制度、完善原告资格问题的重要性及必要性。文章第二部分是行政公益诉讼案件之相关理论问题研究。这一部分主要阐述了行政公益诉讼原告资格的涵义、原告资格的确认以及我国行政公益诉讼原告资格制度现状等问题。其中,原告资格的确认主要从合法权益与法律上的利害关系这一角度加以阐述。分析我国行政公益诉讼原告资格制度时,又分别从现行法律规定和理论观点两个方面进行概括总结。文章第三部分是域外行政公益诉讼原告资格制度的现状分析。这一部分首先从大陆法系和英美法系出发,对主要国家的原告资格制度加以研究,最后通过对域外行政公益诉讼原告资格制度的比较分析,总结出对构建我国原告资格制度有所裨益的启示。第四部分是案件引发的思考。这一部分主要从制度构建的角度来解决行政公益诉讼原告资格的问题。包括完善行政公益诉讼原告资格的确认标准、构建行政公益诉讼原告资格制度、完善行政公益诉讼原告资格的保障制度等方面的内容。完善行政公益诉讼原告资格的确认标准,解决的是什么情况下可以当事人有资格提起行政公益诉讼的问题。构建行政公益诉讼原告资格制度,主要解决的是谁可以提起行政公益诉讼的问题。完善行政公益诉讼原告资格的保障制度,主要从举证责任和诉讼费用承担等方面给提起行政公益诉讼的原告以诉权保障,鼓励公众加入到公益诉讼的行列。更多还原

【Abstract】 Our country is in a critical period of social transformation, the interests of the pattern of relationships and interests change sparked intense conflict and contradiction, all kinds of real life there are a lot of public interests are violated, but cannot get the judicial relief. Therefore, whether from the perspective of legal theory and practice analysis, the implementation of the administrative litigation of public interests system in our country has a strong practical and targeted. In this paper affirmed our country should establish the administrative litigation of public interests, against the background of the core issues, namely the plaintiff qualification problem were studied.The article is divided into four parts. The first part introduces two administrative public interest litigation cases. The two cases are similar, but be made different decisions. The phenomenon shows the importance and necessity to establish the administrative litigation of public interests system, perfecting the plaintiff qualification system in our country. The second part is the related theory problems of administrative litigation of public interests case. This part mainly expounds the meaning of the plaintiff qualification of administrative litigation of public interests, the confirmation and the present situation about administrative litigation of public interests in our country. Among them, the confirmation of plaintiff qualification analyze from the legitimate rights and interests and legal interests. Analysis of present situation in our country summarizes from two aspects, including current law regulation and theory point of view. The third part is the analysis of administrative litigation of public interests in other country. This part embarks the plaintiff qualification of administrative litigation of public interests in the main country about civil law system and common law system. Then, summing up some enlightenment on the plaintiff qualification system in our country. The fourth part is some thinking caused by the cases. This part put some advance about the building of plaintiff qualification system in our country. Including the confirmation standard and the construction, improving the security system of plaintiff qualification of administrative litigation of public interests. The confirmation standard solves the problem that what circumstance that the parties are entitled to the subject of administrative litigation of public interests. The construction solves the problem that who can bring administrative litigation of public interests. The security system, mainly from the aspects such as the burden of proof and litigation costs to bring administrative suit right of the plaintiff in administrative litigation of public interests to guarantee, encourage the public to join the public welfare lawsuit.更多还原